Jiji K. S vs. Shibu. K
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List On (Date) [03-01-2022]
Listed On:
11 Oct 2021
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.22 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION XI-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. AVANI PAL SINGH
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 8737/2021
JIJI K.S. & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
Respondent(s)
VERSUS
SHIBU. K & ORS.
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.70704/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.70707/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.70706/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES )
Date: 10-11-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.
<pre>For Petitioner(s)</pre>Mr. Mohammed Sadique T.A., AOR Mr. Amit Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Anu K. Joy, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. John Mathew, AOR Mr. C. K. Sasi, AOR Mr. Harish Pandey, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the <pre>Court made the following</pre>
O R D E R
Ld. Advocate, Mr. Alim Anvar, appearing on behalf of A.Lakshminarayanan, Advocate-on-record appears Mr. and submits that Application for Intervention $\texttt{i.e.}$ I.A.No.96101/2021 has been filed $\mathbf{on}$ behalf $of$ Sime Mann VA et Lakshminarayanan on 10.8.2021. Office shall verify and $\n\begin{array}{c}\n\text{Using} \ \text{ly signed by} \ \text{anyway} \ \text{anyway} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{long} \ \text{$ 12:533p<sup>15</sup>OCESS the same as per rules.
Service is complete on respondent Nos.1, 6, 10 and 12 but none has entered appearance.
The office report indicates that respondent No.2 has filed counter affidavit.
Respondent Nos.3 and 4 are granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter affidavit.
Respondent No.14 is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit.
Ld. counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time, as last opportunity, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of respondent Nos.5, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 13.
List again on 3.1.2022.
AVANI PAL SINGH Registrar