Vaidik Shivdutt Joshi (Yagiq) @ Shivdutt Joshi (Since Deceased) Through Legal Heirs vs. Shakuntala Devi
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble Vineet Saran, Hon'ble J.K. Maheshwari
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
22 Apr 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.9
COURT NO.9
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).6820-6823/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-01-2022 in SBCRP No. 218/2019 11-01-2022 in SBCRP No. 270/2019 23-03-2022 in SBCRP No. 8/2022 23-03-2022 in SBCRP No. 9/2022 passed by the High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan At Jaipur)
VAIDIK SHIVDUTT JOSHI (YAGIQ) @ SHIVDUTT JOSHI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SHAKUNTALA DEVI & ORS. Respondent $(s)$ (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.55989/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.55988/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. )
Date: 22-04-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
- For Petitioner(s) Ms. Shobha Gupta, AOR Mr. Rajendra Kumar Panigrahi, Adv. Mr. Nishant Bahuguna, Adv. Ms. Pooja Sharma, Adv Mr. Vidit Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Prachi Sharma, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Shubham Jalan, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
In exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution, we are not find any ground to interfere with the order passed by the High Court. The Special Leave Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.
application(s), if any, stands Pendina disposed $of$ ure Not Verified ordingly. $\frac{1}{2}$
| (ARJUN BISHT) | (RAM SUBHAG SINGH) | (ASHWANI THAKUR) |
|---|---|---|
| (COURT MASTER (SH) | (BRANCH OFFICER) | AR-CUM-PS |