Karamjit Singh vs. The State Of Punjab

\2002 1

ITEM NO.6 + 57 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).25962/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/05/2011 in CWP No.7410/2008 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SWARAN SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for vacating stay and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No.33718/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No.3384/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5607/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5608/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8442/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10575/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11183/2012 SLP(C) No. 12547/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 17603/2012 (With I.A. Nos.6-7 for placing on records additional documents and directions and appln.(s) for discharge of advocate on record and appln.(s) for dismissal of SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) Nos. 17816-17817/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 22731/2012 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Interim Relief) SLP(C) No. 23587/2012 (With Interim Relief) SLP(C) No. 28782/2012 (With Office Report) Signature Not Verified SLP(C) No. 34151/2012 Digitally signed by Sanjay Kumar Date: 2015.08.28 (With Office Report) 17:34:46 IST Reason: SLP(C) No. 1285/2013 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Interim Relief) SLP(C) No. 11078/2013 2

SLP(C) No. 16525/2013 (With Interim Relief) SLP(C) No. 25742/2013 (With I.A. No.1 for c/delay in filing SLP and Interim Relief) SLP(C) No. 30011/2013 (With I.A. Nos.4 & 5 for c/delay in filing SLP and for c/delay in re-filing SLP and Office Report) Contempt Petition (Civil) No.539/2015 in SLP(C) No.17603/2012 (With appln.(s) for directions and permission to file additional documents and office report) Date : 28/08/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jay Kishor Singh,Adv. Mr. Gautam Godara, Adv. Mr. Vipin Gogia, Adv. Ms. Jaspreet Gogia,Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ajay G. Majithia, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar,Adv. Ms. S. Janani,Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. Vikas Singh Jangra, Adv. Mr. Zorawar Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Shikha Roy, adv. Mr. Shivendu Garg, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sitesh Narayan Singh, Adv. For Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Ugra Shankar Prasad,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kothari, Adv. Mr. Sajith. P,Adv. 3 Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahamdi, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Bimal Roy Jad,Adv. Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, AAG Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Ish Puneet Singh, Adv. Mr. S.L. Aneja,Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv.

Mr. Anis Ahmed Khan,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. Mr. K.G. Bhagat, Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Rahul Dagar, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Garg, Adv. Mr. Ashish Garg, Adv. Mr. T.L. Garg, Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. Mr. S. L. Aneja,Adv. Mr. R.K. Rathore, Adv. Mr. Sukhjinder Singh, Adv. Mr. Vinay Arora, Adv. For Mr. S.S. Rawat, Adv. Mr. Puneet Parihar, Adv. Ms. Anjali Chauhan, Adv. For M/s Aura & Co. Ms. Tina Garg, Adv. Mr. M.K. Ghosh, Adv. Mr. B. Ramana Murthy, Adv. 4

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Service of show cause notice is not complete in some of these matters.

List these cases after six weeks.

In SLP(C) No.1285/2013, office report dated 27.08.2015 reveals that respondent nos.8 and 21 have died.

In the meanwhile, the petitioners shall take steps for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent nos.8 and 21 in SLP(C) No.1285/2013.

Contempt Petition (Civil) No.539/2015 in SLP(C) No.17603/2012

It is stated that copy of this contempt petition has been served upon the Standing Counsel for the Respondent-State of Punjab.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-States prays for and is granted four weeks' time to file reply to the said contempt petition.

List the contempt petition along with other connected matters

after six weeks.

In the meanwhile, status quo, as it exists today, shall be maintained by the parties.

(Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master