Karamjit Singh vs. The State Of Punjab

:ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2015, I.A. 4/2015, I.A. 5/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11183/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12/07/2011 in CWP No. 6587/2008 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) KIRPAL SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 18/01/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K.K. Mahalik, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Ms. Anjali Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Sitesh Narayan Singh, Adv. for M/s Aura & Co. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the applications. Accordingly to para 7 of the application for substitution, respondent No.3 had expired in the year 1991, his son had also expired in April, 1992 and daughter-in-law in the year 2011. There is no explanation for the delay in preferring the said application. Hence, application for condonation of delay, as also, application for substitution to bring on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3 are dismissed. Consequently, the special leave petition qua respondent No.3 abates and is dismissed as such. (SWETA DHYANI) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY)

 Sr. P.A. COURT MASTER