Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Nellore vs. Mulathaneswara Swamyvari Devasthanam, Nellore Rep. By Its Executive Officer

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Arun Mishra
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:4 Mar 2016
CNR:SCIN010111042015

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.58 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 7499-7504/2015

SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND ACQUISITION, NELLORE Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

MULATHANESWARA SWAMYVARI DEVASTHANAM, NELLORE AND ORS. AND ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing slp)

Date : 04/03/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Guntur Prabhakar,Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Goli Rama Krishna, Adv. Mr. Abhijit Sengupta,Adv. Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C)..CC No. 7499/2015

Respondent No. 1 has already filed counter affidavit.

Respondent Nos. 2 and 7 have not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted. As such, further opportunity is declined.

None appears for Respondent Nos. 3, 4, 6 an 9 despite due service.

Despite last opportunity having been granted, application for substitution of Lrs. of deceased respondent Nos. 5 and 8 has not been filed. As such further opportunity is declined.

Registry to process for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chambers for further directions.

SLP(C)..CC No. 7500/2015

Signature Not Verified

Respondent No. 1 has already filed counter affidavit.

Respondent Nos. 2,4,6 and 8 have not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted. As such, further opportunity is declined. Digitally signed by SONALI SAUND Date: 2016.05.16 10:22:24 IST Reason:

...contd.2/-

Despite last opportunity having been granted, application for substitution of Lrs. of deceased respondent nos. 3,5 and 7 has not been filed. As such further opportunity is declined.

Fresh steps for service of Respondent No. 9 be taken within two weeks time and notice thereafter, be issued.

SLP(C)..CC No. 7501/2015

Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 have not filed counter affidavit, despite last opportunity having been granted. As such, further opportunity is declined.

Despite last opportunity having been granted, application for substitution of Lrs. of deceased respondent nos. 1 and 2 has not been filed. As such further opportunity is declined.

Process for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chambers for further directions.

SLP(C)..CC No. 7502/2015

Respondent No. 1 has not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted.

As such, process for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per Rules.

SLP(C)..CC No. 7503/2015

Respondent Nos. 1, 5 and 7 have not filed counter affidavit, despite last opportunity having been granted. As such, further opportunity is declined.

Respondent No. 8 has already filed counter affidavit.

Last opportunity for filing counter affidavit to Respondent No. 3 within four weeks time is granted.

None appears for Respondent No. 9 despite due service.

Fresh steps for service of Respondent No. 2 be taken within two weeks time and notice thereafter, be issued.

Despite last opportunity having been granted, application for substitution of Lrs. of deceased respondent nos. 4 and 6 has not been filed. As such, further opportunity is declined.

Process for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chambers for further directions.

-2-

SLP(C)..CC No. 7504/2015

Respondent Nos. 1 and 5 have not filed counter affidavit, despite last opportunity having been granted. As such, further opportunity is declined.

Despite last opportunity having been granted, application for substitution of Lrs. of deceased respondent nos. 3, 6 and 8 has not been filed. As such further opportunity is declined.

Process for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chambers for further directions.

Fresh steps for service of Respondent Nos. 2 and 9 be taken within two weeks time and notice thereafter, be issued.

None appears for Respondent No. 4 despite due service. Respondent No. 7 has already filed counter affidavit. List again on 01.07.2016.

(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(29) - 9 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 3 Jul 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(27) - 24 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 4 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 4 May 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 4 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 4 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(12) - 4 Mar 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 4 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 4 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 4 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 4 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 4 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 4 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 4 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 4 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 4 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 4 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 4 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 6 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 6 Jan 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 6 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 26 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 26 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 7 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 7 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 7 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 7 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 27 Apr 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data