Maharashtra State Coop. Bank Ltd Etc. Through Its Assistant Director Mr. Sudhir Mahadev Mhetre vs. Ashok Gulabrao Chavan And Ors. Etc
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Surya Kant
Stage:
Mercantile Laws, Commercial Transactions Including Banking : Matters relating to Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Reinforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Remarks:
List the matter after disposal of [CA No. 5674 of 2009]
Listed On:
3 Apr 2020
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY
Civil Appeal No(s). 3181/2009
MAHARASHTRA STATE COOP.BANK LTD. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)
([ONLY CA NO. 3278-79 OF 2009, SC NO. 17727 OF 2008, SC NO. 20915 OF 2008, 19398-99 OF 2008 AND SC NO. 20228-30 OF 2008 TO BE LISTED BEFORE REGISTRAR COURT). )
WITH C.A. No. 3278-3279/2009 (IX) ) SLP(C) No. 20228-20230/2008 (IX) ) SLP(C) No. 19398-19399/2008 (IX) ) SLP(C) No. 17727/2008 (IX) ) SLP(C) No. 20915/2008 (IX)
Date : 11-01-2023 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
For Appellant(s)
Ms. Chandan Ramamurthi, AOR Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR Mr. Amol Nirmalkumar Suryawanshi, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Signature Not Verified |
---|
Digitally signed by<br>Indu Marwab<br>Date: 2023-01.12<br>16:24:43 IST<br>Reason: |
Mr Amith J, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Mahale, AOR Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav, AOR Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR Dr. Sushil Balwada, AOR Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR
Contd….
Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR Mr Yuvaraj Baburao Gaikwad, Adv. Mr Aditya Pande, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R
C.A. No. 3278-3279/2009
C.A. No. 3278/2009
Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks' time to take appropriate steps in respect of respondent no.9(dead).
C.A. No. 3279/2009
Respondent nos. 2 and 6 are duly represented.
Service is complete on respondent nos. 1 and 3 to 5 but none has entered appearance.
SLP(C) No. 19398-19399/2008
SLP(C) No. 19398/2008
Respondent nos. 1,4,7 and 13 have failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined.
Service is complete on respondent nos. 5 and 8 but none has entered appearance.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has neither taken fresh steps nor filed fresh particulars in respect of respondent nos.2,3,6 and 9 to 12 despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary directions. SLP(C) No. 19399/2008
Respondent no.2 has filed counter affidavit.
Respondent nos. 1 and 3 have failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined.
SLP(C) No. 20228-20230/2008
Respondent nos.4 and 7 in SLP(C) No. 20228/2008 and respondent no.4 in SLP(C) No. 20229/2008 have failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has neither taken fresh steps nor filed fresh particulars in respect of respondent nos.1 to 3, 5,6 and 8 to 16 in SLP(C) No. 20228/2008, respondent nos 1 to 3 in SLP(C) No. 20229/2008 and respondent nos 1 to 4 in SLP(C) No. 20230/2008 despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary directions.
SLP(C) No. 17727/2008
Respondent no.6 has failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has neither taken fresh steps nor filed fresh particulars in respect of respondent nos.1 to 5 despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary directions.
-3-
Item no.4
SLP(C) No. 20915/2008
Respondent no.5 has failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has neither taken fresh steps nor filed fresh particulars in respect of respondent nos.1 to 4 and 6 to 9 despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary directions.
H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar