Rani Punjabi vs. The State (N. C. T. Of Delhi) Ministry Of Home Civil Secretrate Through Secretary

$12/10/15$ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FGISTR CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION NO. $908$ $6929$ No. Rosi Purlabi ...Petitioner $\cdot \text{ }\underbar{\text{ve}}\text{RSUS}$ Bhaura minghrant<br>OFFICE REPORT ....Respondent The Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble-Court / Ld. Registrar Court on $\frac{25-8-15}{2}$ , 201 when the Court / he was granted / directed R. P. enclosed. READY / FOR THE REASON: 1 and $70.908$ |17. Cival interest Accordingly, Notice was issued to the sole Respondent through Registered<br>Post on 16915 A as well as Dasti / through Trial Court. $\frac{16915}{2000}$ As well as Dasti / through Trial Court. $\frac{1}{2}$ im $1.2692$ $\overline{2}$ It is submitted that unserved cover containing the notice has been received. back from sole Respondent with the Postal remarks,"_ It is submitted that neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover has been received back from sole respondent, so far. batistic water It is submitted that A.D. Card duly signed by the sole Respondent has been. received but no one has filed Vakalatnama and memo of appearance on his behalf so far. It is submitted that Service Report has been received from the Trial Court stating -5 therein that The counsel has filed an Affidavit of service after effecting Dasti service on the Respondent No. / has not filed Affidavit of service of dash notice. SERVICE OF NOTICE IS NOT COMPLETE. Unboth mothers. The matter (s) js / are listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this)Office Report. Dated this the $q^{1/3}$ day of October 901S 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: MR. Deepak Goel. Advocate Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR