Rani Punjabi vs. The State (N. C. T. Of Delhi) Ministry Of Home Civil Secretrate Through Secretary

\214ITEM NO.46 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 924/2015 RANI PUNJABI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH T.P.(C) No. 104/2016 (With appln.(s) for stay and Office Report) Date : 14/12/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sachin Patil,Adv. Mr Siddarth Naidu, Adv. M/s Ksn & Co.,Adv. Mr Kartik Nagarkatti, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Malhotra,Adv. For Respondent(s) D S Mehra,Adv. Mr Kartik Nagarkatti, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Malhotra,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. Mr. Sudhir Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr Ravi Ranjan, Adv. Mr Shekhar Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R T.P.(C) No.924/2015 Opportunity to respondent nos. 1,3 and 5 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. -2- Item No.46 Respondent nos. 2 and 9 have already filed counter affidavit. None appears for respondent nos. 4 and 6 to 8 despite due service. T.P.(C) No.104/2016 Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent nos. 1 and 2 have not filed counter affidavit, as such further opportunity is declined. None appears for respondent nos. 3 to 5,7,8 and 11 despite due service. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos. 6,9,10 and 12 within two weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. Dasti in addition is allowed. List again on 30.1.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar