Shafeeque Rehman K. V vs. Aligarh Muslim University
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List before court/bench
Listed On:
12 Jan 2021
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.20 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION XI-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. AVANI PAL SINGH
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8612-8613/2021
SYED AHMED SAAD
Petitioner(s)
Respondent $(s)$
VERSUS
HAMZA V.K. & ORS.
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.67918/2021-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.67919/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )
WITH
SLP(C) No. 8619-8620/2021 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.68078/2021-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.68079/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
Date: 01-12-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pallavi Pratap, AOR Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Kaleeswaram Raj, Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mr. Thulasi K. Rai, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Shadan Farasat, AOR Mr. Bharat Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shourya Dasgupta, Adv. Mr. Aman Nagvi, Adv. Ms. Hafza Khan, Adv. Mr. Navneet R., Adv. Ms. Roopali Lakhotia, Adv. Mr. Krishna Dev Jagarlamudi, AOR Ms. Resmitha R. Chandran, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R $\mathbb{S}^{\mathbb{Z}}$ P(C) No. 8612-8613/2021
Respondent Nos.1 to 6 in SLP(C) No. 8612/2021 and
contd....
respondent Nos.2 to 6 in SLP(C) No. 8613/2021 have already filed counter affidavit.
Ld. counsel appearing for respondent No.9 in SLP(C) No.8612/2021 submits that they do not wish to file their counter affidavit. Submission is taken on record.
Service is complete on respondent Nos.7 and 8 in SLP(C) No. 8612/2021 and respondent Nos.1, 7 and 8 in SLP(C) No.8613/2021 but none has entered appearance on their behalf.
It has been brought to the notice of this Court that records reflect that there are ten respondents in SLP(C) No.8612/2021 and Ld. Advocate, Mr. Varun K. appears on behalf of respondent No.10, though the office report states that there are only nine respondents in the said SLP. This is an unfortunate position and shows non-application of mind by the concerned staff officials. They may be more cautious while preparing the office report to avoid such inconvenience to the Court.
SLP(C) No. 8619-8620/2021
Respondent Nos.1 to 6 have already filed counter affidavit.
Service is complete on respondent Nos.7 and 9 but none has entered appearance on their behalf.
Contd…..
-2-
Ld. counsel appearing for respondent No.8 submits that they do not wish to file their counter affidavit. Submission is taken on record.
An application seeking permission to file additional documents in respect of respondent No.6 has been filed which has been registered as I.A. No.139736/2021. The same may be processed as per rules.
Records reveal that counter affidavit has also been filed on behalf of respondent No.10 in SLP(C) No.8612- 8613/2021.
Registry to process the matters for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
AVANI PAL SINGH Registrar