Pradyuman Bisht vs. Union Of India Department Of Justice Through Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
16 Jun 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.25 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K. ARUL
Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 99/2015
PRADYUMAN BISHT Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With appln. (s) for interim relief and permission to appear and argue in person and stay and office report)
Date : 14/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. A.K. Raina, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv. Mr. Rohit Pratap, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Singh, Adv. Mr. Mohan Kumar,Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar Vikkey, Adv. Mohd. Naseem Mughal, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Respondent no. 2 has not filed counter affidavit, as per office report. But learned Counsel for respondent no. 2 submits that he has filed counter affidavit on 12.3.2016. Registry to verify and record the proof.
Four weeks time is granted to respondent nos. 1 and 3 for filing counter affidavit.
Service is complete on respondent nos. 4 and 5 but no one has entered appearance.
Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent nos. 6 and 7 have not filed counter affidavit. As such, further opportunity is declined. Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Signature Not Verified
List again on 6.5.2016. Date: 2016.03.16 10:15:28 IST Reason:
(DR. K. ARUL) Registrar