Seelam Radha Krishna Murthy vs. Tatineni Sivaji
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy, Hon'ble Manoj Misra
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
5 Jan 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).3877-3879/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-12-2022 in CRLP No. 2821/2019 21-12-2022 in CRLP No. 4084/2022 21-12-2022 in CRLP No. 4775/2022 passed by the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh At Amravati)
SEELAM RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
TATINENI SIVAJI & ANR. ETC. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION)
WITH SLP(Crl) No(s). 5084-5086/2023 (II) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)
SLP(Crl) No(s). 3932-3934/2023 (II) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)
Date : 01-05-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
Reason:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kondaveti Ravi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ch. Leela Sarveswar, Adv. Mr. B. Paramesh, Adv. Mr. R. Ravi, Adv. Mr. C. Raghavendren, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Gupta, Adv. Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
We have heard Mr. Kondaveti Ravi, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner. Digitally signed by Jayant Kumar Arora Date: 2023.05.02 18:15:49 IST Signature Not Verified
We see no reason to interfere with the impugned order. As such the special leave petitions stand dismissed.
However, the dismissal of the special leave petitions will not foreclose the option of the petitioner to explore other legal remedies in accordance with law.
Pending application(s), if any, stand closed.
(MAHABIR SINGH) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASST. REGISTRAR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR