Yashpal Singh vs. Union Of India Thru The Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble L. Nageswara Rao
Stage:
ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
24 Oct 2017
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).2296/2015
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24-12-2014 in WPC No.1989/2014 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)
SH. VIJAY KUMAR DAHIYA & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH SLP(C) No. 7630/2015 (XIV) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 1/2015 and IA No.59385/2017-impleading party and IA No.89166/2017-DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORD) SLP(C) No. 8214/2015 (XIV) SLP(C) No. 11346/2015 (XIV) (IA No.89178/2017-DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORD) SLP(C) No. 11954/2015 (XIV) (IA No.89172/2017-DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORD)
Date : 24-10-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Mishra, AOR
Dr. Suraj Singh, Adv. Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Amit Pratap Shaunak, Adv.
Dr. K.B. Sounder Rajan, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, AOR Ms. Shriya Chauhan, Adv.
Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Mukul Singh, Adv. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Raj Bhadhur, Adv.<br>Mr. Jatin Bhasin, Adv.<br>For Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR | |
| Mr. Sarfraz Ahmed Siddiqui, Adv.<br>Mr. Satya Siddiqui, Adv. |
Mr. Zaki Kazmi, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. Ms. Vibha Dutta Makhija, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohd. Fuzail Khan, Adv. Ms. Shefali Jain, Adv. Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv. Ms. Disha Viash, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
We find no merit in these special leave petitions and the same are dismissed.
However, appointment of any of the petitioners affected by the impugned order, when applies in future, pursuant to any advertisement, the Union of India shall consider age relaxation in their favour as provided under the law.
The applications for discharge of Advocate-on-Record are allowed.
As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER