H. S. I. D. C vs. Raj Singh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
9 May 2012
Order Text
è
ITEM NO.56 Court No.6 SECTION IVB
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
I.A. No. 2 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).21615/2012
(From the judgement and order dated 05/07/2011 in RFA No.1982/2001 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)
HSIDC Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
DAYA NAND & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for directions and office report)
WITH
I.A. No. 2 in SLP(C) No. 21619/2012 (For directions and office report) I.A. No. 2 in SLP(C) No. 21163/2012 (For directions and office report) I.A. No. 2 in SLP(C) No. 21605/2012 (For directions and office report) I.A. No. 2 in SLP(C) No. 21617/2012 (For directions and office report) Date: 18/04/2013 These matters was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amrendra Sharan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Govind Goel, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ankit Goel, Adv. Mr. Rahul Pandey, Adv. Mr. Vikas Sangwan, Adv. Mr. S.P. Khatri, Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
agreed that the petitioner will deposit the entire amount as directed by the High Court within a period of six weeks from today before the Execution Court and the learned Court may permit the claimants to withdraw 50% of the amount without furnishing any security and 50% by furnishing their personal bonds. -2-
With these observations, all the IAs are disposed of.
| (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) |(M.S. NEGI) | | Court Master | Court Master |
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order