H. S. I. D. C vs. Raj Singh

ITEM NO.73 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).21114/2012 HSIDC NOW KNOWN AS HSIIDC Petitioner(s) VERSUS MANGE AND ORS Respondent(s) (With office report) with SLP(C) Nos.21115,21116,21118,21120,21123.21126,21127,21128, 21131-32,21134,21139,21140,21143,21146,21154,21156,21158,21159, 21163-65,21186,21189-91,21198-99,21201-204,21517,21519,21521- 21523,21525,21532-33,21535-21546,21548-21560,21570-21573,21575, 21580,21583,21002,21585,21587-21590,21593,21597,21601,21603, 21605,21607,21609-610,21613,21615,21617-619,21621,21623,21625- 21631/2012 (with office report) Date: 08/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Govind Goel, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Adv. Mr. Vivek Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv. Mr. T. Anamika, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A very confusing and cryptic report seems to have been prepared by the Registry in all these batch of matters, Item No.73 -2 which does not reflect the correct status/position of all the respondents. While preparing the office report in such batch of matters, Registry should be very cautious and careful about the correct position of each respondent in each of the matters. It should be made ensure that the status/position of each matter should be shown separately, rather than including the entire batch of the matters, which are ready to be listed before the Hon'ble Court. For want of clear report on record, the Court is not in a position to pass any appropriate orders. Registry to take note and submit a clear report by the next date. List again on 22.3.2013. | | | (M.A. SAYEED) | | | |REGISTRAR |

| | | |

rd