The Secretary To Govt. Of Kerala vs. James Varghese

*1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A. NOS.2 & 3 OF 2016 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.9009 OF 2014 STATE OF KERALA & ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS P. RAVEENDRAN NAIR (D) TH:LRS. RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R I.A. No. 2 The Civil appeal has been dismissed for non compliance with the directions issued by the Honble Judge in Chambers on 14.10.2015. The delay has been satisfactorily explained in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of the application. Hence the application for restoration is allowed. The Civil Appeal is restored to its original number. I.A. No. 3 There is a delay of 113 days in filing the application for restoration. It appears that the present Civil appeal was listed with Civil Appeal No.6258 of 2014 before the Honble Judge in Chambers on 14.10.2015 when certain directions were issued for compliance within two weeks. It is stated that the learned counsel for the appellants has taken necessary steps but there was a 2 delay of 2 days in other connected appeals which came to be dismissed as a result, for non compliance. The present Civil Appeal is also dismissed together with the other Civil Appeals. Cause shown is sufficient. Hence delay is condoned. ...........................J. ( D.Y. CHANDRACHUD ) NEW DELHI, NOVEMBER 07, 201 6 3 ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.14 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2016, I.A. 3/2016 in Civil Appeal No(s).9009/2014 STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS P. RAVEENDRAN NAIR (D) TH:LRS. Respondent(s) (For restoration and c/delay in filing application for restoration and office report) Date : 07/11/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) Mr. G. Prakash, AOR Jishnu M. L., Adv. Manu Srinath, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. John Mathew, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 2 The Civil appeal has been dismissed for non compliance with the directions issued by the Honble Judge in Chambers on 14.10.2015. The delay has been satisfactorily explained in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of the application. Hence the application for restoration is allowed. The Civil Appeal is restored to its original number. I.A. No. 3 There is a delay of 113 days in filing the application for restoration. It appears that the present Civil appeal was listed with Civil Appeal No.6258 of 2014 before the Honble Judge in Chambers on

4 14.10.2015 when certain directions were issued for compliance within two weeks. It is stated that the learned counsel for the appellants has taken necessary steps but there was a delay of 2 days in other connected appeals which came to be dismissed as a result, for non compliance. The present Civil Appeal is also dismissed together with the other Civil Appeals. Cause shown is sufficient. Hence delay is condoned. (RASHI GUPTA) SR. P. A. (MADHU NARULA) COURT MASTER [SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE]