The Secretary To Govt. Of Kerala vs. James Varghese
Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble L. Nageswara Rao
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:30 Jun 2016
CNR:SCIN010104372014
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
9 Jul 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Listed on: 30.6.2016 Court No. R2 Item No. 15 SECTION XIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 6258, 6260, 6262, 6265, 9001, 9002, 9016, 9018, 9022, 9212, 9213, 9217, 9222, 9225, 9238, 9241, 9210 OF 2014 AND 295 OF 2015.
The Secretary to Govt. of Kerala & Ors. Etc. ...Appellants
Versus
James Varghese & Ors. Etc. ..Respondents
OFFICE REPORT
C.A. NOS. 9001, 9018, 9016, 9022, 9212, 9213, 9225 and 9241 of 2016
The matters above mentioned alongwith connected matters were listed before the Ld. Registrar on 18th March, 2016, when he was pleased to pass the Order (Copy of Order dated 18.3.2016 is enclosed herewith).
AND C.A. Nos. 9002, 9210, 6258, 6260, 6262, 9222, 9217, 9238, 6265 OF 2014 AND 295
OF 2015.
| S.No. | Civil Appeal Nos. | No.<br>of<br>Responde<br>nts | Service Position | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 6258 of 2014 | 3 | Respondent No. 1 is represented<br>through Mr. A. Raghunath,<br>Advocate. R. No. 2 is deleted<br>vide<br>court's<br>order<br>dated<br>29.03.2016 and R. No. 3 is<br>served but no one has entered<br>appearance and the matter was<br>(administratively) placed before<br>the<br>Ld.<br>Registrar<br>on<br>24.05.2016 , when the following<br>order was passed:<br>"Service is complete.<br>Both the parties have failed to<br>file the statement of case.<br>Hence list the matter before<br>Registrar Court for filing<br>affidavit of valuation." | Complete |
Service position of the matters abovementioned are given below:
| S.No. | Civil Appeal Nos. | No.<br>of<br>Responde<br>nts | Service Position | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2. | 6260 of 2014 | 3 | There are 3 respondents in this<br>matter. R. No. 2 is served<br>through High Court but no one<br>has entered appearance. The<br>matter was (administratively)<br>placed before the Ld. Registrar<br>on<br>08.06.2016,<br>when<br>the<br>following order was passed:<br>"Await certificate of service in<br>respect of R1 and R3 from<br>High Court.<br>Reminder<br>be<br>issued<br>accordingly.<br>List on 31.08.2016"<br>Accordingly a reminder has<br>been issued on 13.06.2016 to<br>High Court to dispatch the<br>certificate of service in respect of<br>R. Nos. 1 & 3 and certificate of<br>service is awaited. | Incomplete |
| 3. | 6262 of 2014 | 3 | There are 3 Respondents. R. No.<br>2 is served through High Court<br>but<br>no<br>one<br>has<br>entered<br>appearance. In respect of R Nos.<br>1 & 3 service is awaited as per<br>certificate<br>of<br>service<br>dated<br>9.1.2015 received from the High<br>court. | Incomplete |
| 4. | 6265 of 2014 | 4 | There are 4 Respondents. R.<br>Nos. 1 to 4 are served through<br>High Court as per certificate of<br>service dated 5.2.2015 but no<br>one has entered appearance on<br>their behalf so far.<br>Counsel for the appellant has not<br>filed statement of case so far. | Complete |
| 5. | 9001 of 2014 | Sole | Counsel for the Appellant has<br>not filed statement of case so far. | Complete |
| S.No. | Civil Appeal Nos. | No.<br>of<br>Responde<br>nts | Service Position | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6. | 9002 of 2014 | Sole | Counsel for the appellant has<br>filed application for substitution<br>and the same is allowed vide<br>court's order dated 04.05.2016.<br>Cause title has been amended<br>accordingly.<br>Service is complete on Lrs. Nos.<br>(i), (iii), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii) and<br>(ix) of deceased sole respondent<br>but<br>no<br>one<br>has<br>entered<br>appearance on their behalf so far.<br>Counsel for the appellant has not<br>filed<br>proof<br>of<br>service<br>of<br>Chamber Summons in respect of<br>Lrs. Nos. (ii) and (iv). | Incomplete |
| 7. | 9016 of 2014 | Sole<br>(Dead) | There are 4 Lrs. Of deceased sole<br>respondent. Lrs. Nos. 1 to 3 are<br>represented<br>through<br>Mr.<br>V.<br>Shyamohan, Advocate but counsel<br>for Appellant has not taken any<br>steps to serve Lr. No. 4 residing in<br>U.S.A. and<br>Four weeks time<br>granted by Ld. Registrar on<br>18.03.2016<br>has<br>already<br>been<br>expired. | Incomplete<br>on Lr. No. 4 |
| 8. | 9018 & 9241 of 2014 | Sole<br>(Common) | Respondent is common in both<br>the matters. Certificate of service<br>dated 08.01.2016 and 31.03.2016<br>has been received from High<br>Court in both the matters stating<br>therein that "Respondent is lying<br>in an unconscious state due to<br>paralysis. (Daughter refused to<br>accept the notice)." A letter has<br>been issued on 12.04.2016 to the<br>counsel for appellant to take<br>appropriate action but he has not<br>done the needful so far. | Incomplete |
| 9. | 9022 of 2014 | Sole | Counsel for the Appellant has<br>not filed the statement of case so<br>far. | Complete |
| S.No. | Civil Appeal Nos. | No.<br>of<br>Responde<br>nts | Service Position | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10. | 9212 of 2014 | 2 | Counsel for the Appellant has<br>filed<br>fresh<br>particulars<br>of<br>Respondent No. 1 and fresh<br>Notice of Lodgement of Petition<br>of Appeal has been issued on<br>24.06.2016. Certificate of service<br>is awaited. Respondent No. 2 is<br>served through High Court but<br>no<br>one<br>has<br>filed<br>vakalatnama/appearance on his<br>behalf. | Incomplete<br>on<br>Respondent<br>No. 1 |
| 11. | 9213 of 2014 | Sole | Counsel for the parties have not<br>filed statement of case so far.<br>Service is complete. | Complete |
| 12. | 9217 of 2014 | 3 | There are 3 Respondents. All are<br>served through High Court as per<br>certificate<br>of<br>service<br>dated<br>21.3.2016 but no one has entered<br>appearance on his behalf so far.<br>Counsel for the Appellant has<br>not filed statement of case so far. | Complete |
| 13. | 9222 of 2014 | Sole | Sole Respondent is represented<br>through<br>Mr.<br>Nishe<br>Rajen<br>Shonker, Advocate.<br>Counsel for the parties have not<br>filed statement of case so far. | Complete |
| 14. | 9225 of 2014 | Sole<br>(Dead) | There are 4 proposed Lrs. Of<br>deceased sole respondent. Lr.<br>Nos. 1, 2 & 4 are represented<br>through Mr. Rajesh P, Advocate.<br>Counsel for the Appellant has<br>not filed proof of chamber<br>summon in respect of Lr. No. 3<br>of deceased sole Respondent and<br>Four weeks time granted by Ld.<br>Registrar on 18.03.2016 has<br>already been expired. | Incomplete<br>on Lr. No. 3 |
| S.No. | Civil Appeal Nos. | No.<br>of<br>Responde<br>nts | Service Position | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15. | 9238 of 2014 | 3 | There are 3 Respondents. R. No.<br>3 is served through High Court<br>but<br>no<br>one<br>has<br>entered<br>appearance on his behalf.<br>Counsel for the appellant has on<br>2.2.2016 filed a letter stating<br>therein that R Nos. 1 and 2 have<br>died, who are the Lrs. of Mr. A.<br>Poulose and there is no other<br>Lrs. Except R. No. 3. A letter has<br>been issued on 5.2.2016 to the<br>counsel<br>for<br>filing<br>proper<br>application for substitution to<br>bring on record the Lrs that<br>Respondent No. 1 and 2 are dead<br>and there are no other Lrs.<br>except Respondent No. 3 but he<br>has not taken any steps so far.<br>Counsel for the Appellant has<br>not filed statement of case so far. | Incomplete |
| 16. | 9210 of 2014 | Sole | Sole Respondent is represented<br>through Mr. P.I. Jose, Advocate.<br>Counsel for the parties have not<br>filed the statement of case so far. | Complete |
| 17. | 295 of 2015 | Sole | Sole Respondent is represented<br>through Mr. John Mathew,<br>Advocate.<br>Counsel<br>for<br>the<br>parties have not filed the<br>statement of case so far. | Complete |
The matters above mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar with this office report.
Dated this the 28th day of June, 2016.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to:
-
- Mr. Jogy Scaria, Adv. (Supreme Court Bar Association)
-
- Mr. P. I Jose, Adv. (120, Old Lawyers Chambers)
-
- Mr. John Mathew, Adv. (Supreme Court Bar Association)
-
- Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Adv. (55, Old Lawyers Chambers)
-
- Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, Adv. (Supreme Court Bar Association)
-
- Mr. Rajesh P, Advocate (Supreme Court Bar Association)
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
d1
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search
Same Parties
The Secretary To Govt. Of Kerala vs James VargheseThe Secretary To Govt. Of KeralaThe State Of Kerala Chief SecretaryThe State Of Kerala Law Department SecretaryThe State Of Kerala Kallada Irriagation Project The Chief EngineerThe State Of Kerala The Superintending EngineerThe State Of Kerala Kallada Irrigation Project Superintending EngineerJames VargheseAll Kerala Irrigarion Projects Contractors Association (Deleted) President (P. P. Thomas)The State Of Delhi Union Of India Secretary To Govt
Search in District Courts Data
The Secretary To Govt. Of KeralaThe State Of Kerala Chief SecretaryThe State Of Kerala Law Department SecretaryThe State Of Kerala Kallada Irriagation Project The Chief EngineerThe State Of Kerala The Superintending EngineerThe State Of Kerala Kallada Irrigation Project Superintending EngineerJames VargheseAll Kerala Irrigarion Projects Contractors Association (Deleted) President (P. P. Thomas)The State Of Delhi Union Of India Secretary To GovtAdvocate C. K. SasiAdvocate Himinder Lal