Aijaz Ahmad Ahanger vs. Union Territory Of Jammu And Kashmir

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, M.M. Sundresh
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:25 Jul 2022
CNR:SCIN010103992022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble M.M. Sundresh

Stage:

AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

Notice [FRESH NOTICE TO R 15 17 N 18], List After (Weeks) [6]

Listed On:

25 Jul 2022

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.35

COURT NO.5

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8067/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16-11-2021 in WP(C) No. 2251/2021 passed by the High Court Of Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh At Srinagar)

AIJAZ AHMAD AHANGER & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)

Date: 25-07-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH

  • For Petitioner(s) Mr.Adil Muneer Andrabi, AOR Mr. Shafqat Nazir, Adv.
    • Mr. Shabir Bhat, Adv.
    • Mr. Yasser Jilani, Adv.
    • Mr. Waseem Rasool Mir, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Ms. Taruna Ardhendumauli Prasad, AOR Ms. Shreya Srivastav, Adv. Mr. Ashish Madan, Adv.

  • Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR
  • Mr. Polanki Gowtham, Adv.
  • Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Adv.
  • Mr. Bhat Fayaz, Adv. Mr. Jamsheet Bhat, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

Learned counsel has entered appearance on behalf of pondent Nos.1 to 3 and states that she will obtain instructions $\quad\text{and}\quad$ will file vakalatnama on behalf of other Institutions/ Authorities also.

Learned counsel has also put in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.7,8,10,11,14,19,20 & 21.

Respondent Nos.15,17 & 18 were sought to be served but as per the postal tracking report, the same is still in transit. The same be awaited. Let simultaneously once again fresh notice be served on respondent Nos.15,17 & 18.

Counter affidavit be filed within three weeks.

Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks.

List after six weeks.

(RASHMI DHYANI PANT) (POONAM VAID) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(10) - 12 Aug 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 2 Aug 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 7 May 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 23 Apr 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 5 Mar 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 19 Feb 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 2 Feb 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 25 Jul 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(2) - 11 Jul 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 6 May 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search