Kiniko Co-Operative Housing Society vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:20 Jan 2023
CNR:SCIN010103892022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble Dinesh Maheshwari, Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy

Stage:

FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

IA Allowed [205638/2022], Notice Returnable [D:0,W:4,M:0]

Listed On:

20 Jan 2023

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

205638/2022,205639/2022,205640/2022,

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

COURT NO.6

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL).................. Diary No(s).10389/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-01-2022 in SA No.786/1999 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay At Aurangabad)

KINIKO CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY

Petitioner(s)

Respondent $(s)$

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

(IA No.205638/2022 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING/CURING THE IA NO.205639/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE DEFECTS, IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA NO. 205640/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

Date: 20-01-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY

  • For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shirish K. Deshpande, AOR Ms. Rucha Pravin Mandlik, Adv. Mr. Mohit Gautam, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR
  • Mr. Ajit Bhasme, Sr. Adv. Mr. A Bhasme, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Pandey, Adv. Ms. Ritu Rastogi, Adv. Ms. Himani Bhatnagar, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$

Delav in refiling is condoned.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that as per his instructions, there had not been any Commissioner's report Summarized on the record of the Trial Court as observed by the High <sup>1633</sup>C<sup>15</sup>Urt in Paragraph 22 of the order impugned. Learned senior counsel further submits that the consideration of the First Appellate Court and the High Court cannot be said to be in conformity with what was deposed by the official witness DW1-Syed Manzooruddin s/o Syed Ahemuddin.

Issue notice, returnable in four weeks.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR accepts notice for Respondent No.2.

Notice be issued to the unrepresented respondent.

Dasti service, in addition to ordinary process is permitted.

In the meanwhile and until further orders, the interim order as passed by the High Court and continued under the order impugned shall remain in operation.

(ARJUN BISHT) (RANJANA SHAILEY)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(5) - 19 Dec 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 4 Sept 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 26 Jul 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 20 Jan 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(1) - 13 Jan 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view