A. Abdul Sathar vs. State Of Kerala
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble M.R. Shah, Hon'ble Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed as withdrawn
Listed On:
17 Apr 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.10
COURT NO.4 SECTION XI-A SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 10350/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29-09-2022 in WP(C) No. 222/2019 29-09-2022 in WP(C) No. 244/2019 08-11-2022 in WP(C) No. 222/2019 08-11-2022 in WP(C) No. 244/2019 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam)
A. ABDUL SATHAR
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.68000/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.68002/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
Date: 17-04-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Basant R, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ramesh Babu M. R., AOR Mr. Abdul Latheef M P, Adv. Mr. Pranav P. Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
Shri R. Basant, learned Senior Advocate, appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Special Leave Petitions with liberty to file a review application, as according petitioner, before passing the impugned order, $\tau$ the the petitioner was not heard.
Without expressing anything on the entertainability and/or manntainability of such review application, the present Special $\begin{array}{c}\n\text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text$ ์" Fave Petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty.
As and when such an application is filed, the same be considered in accordance with law and on its own merits. Even thereafter, if the petitioner is aggrieved by any decision in the review application, it will be open for him to take recourse to law by approaching this Court.
(R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR