A. Abdul Sathar vs. State Of Kerala

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble M.R. Shah
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:17 Apr 2023
CNR:SCIN010103502023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

FRESH

Before:

Hon'ble M.R. Shah, Hon'ble Ahsanuddin Amanullah

Stage:

FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

Dismissed as withdrawn

Listed On:

17 Apr 2023

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.10

COURT NO.4 SECTION XI-A SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 10350/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29-09-2022 in WP(C) No. 222/2019 29-09-2022 in WP(C) No. 244/2019 08-11-2022 in WP(C) No. 222/2019 08-11-2022 in WP(C) No. 244/2019 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam)

A. ABDUL SATHAR

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.68000/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.68002/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

Date: 17-04-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
  • For Petitioner(s) Mr. Basant R, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ramesh Babu M. R., AOR Mr. Abdul Latheef M P, Adv. Mr. Pranav P. Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$

Shri R. Basant, learned Senior Advocate, appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Special Leave Petitions with liberty to file a review application, as according petitioner, before passing the impugned order, $\tau$ the the petitioner was not heard.

Without expressing anything on the entertainability and/or manntainability of such review application, the present Special $\begin{array}{c}\n\text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text$ ์" Fave Petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty.

As and when such an application is filed, the same be considered in accordance with law and on its own merits. Even thereafter, if the petitioner is aggrieved by any decision in the review application, it will be open for him to take recourse to law by approaching this Court.

(R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR