Pradip Jana vs. The State Of West Bengal

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:5 Sept 2022
CNR:SCIN010103352022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

Before:

Hon'ble M.R. Shah, Hon'ble Krishna Murari

Stage:

AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES

Remarks:

Disposed off

Listed On:

9 May 2022

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

54782/2022,54783/2022,

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.8 SECTION II-B

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3492/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-02-2022 in CRM(A) No. 28/2022 passed by the High Court At Calcutta)

PRADIP JANA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL Respondent(s)

IA No. 54782/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT & IA No. 54783/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

Date : 05-09-2022 This matter was called on for hearing today.

  • CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI
  • For Petitioner(s) Mr. Soumya Dutta, AOR Mr. Sushnigdho Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Upmanyu, Adv.
  • For Respondent(s Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, AOR Ms. Vandana Tiwari, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

By the order dated 22.04.2022, this Court passed the following order:-

"1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the material placed on record.

2. Issue notice.

3. In the meanwhile, interim protection against arrest is granted to the petitioner.

4. The petitioner is directed to cooperate in the investigation at all stages. Additionally, the interim protection is subject to compliance of the conditions, as enumerated in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973."

It is reported that the chargesheet is filed against the petitioner and therefore, it appears that custodial interrogation is not required. The petitioner is the father of the mother-in-law of the deceased, who committed suicide. Looking to the age of the petitioner and the fact that now chargesheet is filed and therefore custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required, the interim order passed by this Court, vide order dated 22.04.2022, is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. In case of the arrest of the petitioner, he be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- and with a like surety.

The present Special Leave Petition stands disposed of to the aforesaid extent.

Pending applications also stand disposed of.

(R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(2) - 5 Sept 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(1) - 22 Apr 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view