M Jayamma vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
28 Apr 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 13231344 of 2011
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Appellants
Versus-
LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. & ORS... ...Respondents
OFFICE REPORT
It is submitted that there are 30 respondents. Mr. Chirag M Shroff, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the sole respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1328 of 2011, Mr. O. P. Khaithan, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the sole respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1331 of 2011 and Mr. Sanjan Jain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of both the respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1340 of 2011. A.D. Card duly signed & stamped has been received on behalf of both the respondents in Civil Appeal No 1323 of 2011 and 1341 of 2011. A.D. Card duly signed & stamped has been received on Sole respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1324, 1325, 1327, 1330, 1332, 1333, 1342, 1343 and 1344 of 2011, But no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said respondents. Certificate of Service has been received from the High Court which shows that notice has been served on respondent No. 1 & 2 in Civil Appeal No. 1336 and 1337 of 2011. Service of Notice is complete on the said respondents.
It is further submitted that certificate of service has been received from the High Court on the unserved respondents as per details given below:
| Respondent No./ C.A.No. | Remarks |
|---|---|
| Sole Respondent in 1326 and 1334<br>of 2011 (Common respondents) | Buliding premises under renovation |
| Sole Respondent in 1329 of 2011 | Company shifted |
| Respondent No.1 in 1335 of 2011 | Incomplete Address |
| Respondent No.2 in 1335 of 2011 | do |
| Sole Respondent in 1338 of 2011 | Company does not exist |
| Respondent No. 1 & 2 in 1339 of<br>2011 | Restaurent does not exist and does not reside here |
It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not taken appropriate steps with regard to Service of notice on unserved respondents so far despite registry's request.
The office report is listed before Ld. Registrar for orders.
Dated this the this the 22nd day of September, 2015.
| Copy to: |
|---|
| ---------- |
- 1 Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section
-
- M/s O. P. Khaitan & Co., Advocate B1 Defence Colony, New Delhi110 024
-
- Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocates 95, Lawyers chambers
-
- Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Advocate Chamber No. 92
C2
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR