Sheuli Das vs. Kanchan Bhattacharya
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
5 Jul 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.12
COURT NO.5 $\mathcal{L}$
SECTION XVII-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) ....................................
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-12-2022 FA No.838/2013 passed by the National Consumers Disputes in Redressal Commission, New Delhi)
VERSUS
SHEULI DAS
Petitioner(s)
Respondent(s)
KANCHAN BHATTACHARYA & ANR.
(IA No.75692/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.75693/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
Date: 05-07-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abinash Kumar Mishra, AOR Mr. Gaurav Kr Pandey, Adv. Mr. Prabir Guha Roy, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Delay condoned. 1.
We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at a $2.$ considerable length and carefully perused the material placed on record.
$3.$ The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West as well as the National Consumer Disputes Bengal Redressal Commission, New Delhi, after thorough consideration of the material on record and upon analysis of the relevant placed medical jurisprudence coupled with the principles laid down by this Court From time to time, have concurrently come to a definite conclusion Deficiency in the there is no evidence of negligence or deficiency in the Reason CH Hat there is no evidence of negligence or deficiency in the treatment provided by the respondents to the deceased husband of the petitioner.
4. That being a pure finding of fact, we are satisfied that no case to interfere with the impugned order dated 01.12.2022 passed by the National Consumers Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi is made out.
5. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. 6. As a result, pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)