State Of Arunachal Pradesh vs. Sri Kemar Kamsi
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
àITEM NO.53 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15074/2010 STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SRI KEMAR KAMSI & ORS. Respondent(s) Date: 07/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Rituraj Biswas, Adv. Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Anitha Shenoy, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present. A perusal of the office report reveals that counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of all the respondents but the ld. Counsel representing them has not filed the vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent Nos. 5,12,17,31,47,50,56,57,71 and 89. The ld. Counsel for the respondents shall be directed to file the vakalatnama on their behalf within a weeks' time failing which appropriate orders shall follow on the next date.
List again on 29.4.2011.
(M.K.HANJURA) Registrar
hj