Balaji Enterprises vs. West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble M.M. Sundresh
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
IA Allowed [94656/2022,94660/2022], List After (Weeks) [4]
Listed On:
8 Jan 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
94656/2022,94660/2022,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
1
ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVI
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7242-7247/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-12-2021 and 21.01.2022 in I.A. No.CAN No. 2/2020 in MAT No. 1069/2015, IA No. CAN No. 2/2020 in MAT No. 1129/2015 and IA No. CAN No. 2/2020 in MAT No. 1309/2015 passed by the High Court At Calcutta)
BALAJI ENTERPRISES Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
WEST BENGAL HOUSING INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)
IA No. 94656/2022 - DELETING THE NAME OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IA No. 94660/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 01-08-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Dama Seshadri Naidu, Sr. Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Umang Shankar, AOR | ||
| Ms. Shivali Chaudhary, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Siddharth Chapalguonkar, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Poornachandiran R., Adv. | ||
| Mr. Ananvay Anandvardhan, Adv. | ||
| Ms. Mallika Agarwal, Adv. | ||
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. V.V. Giri, Sr. Adv. | |
| Mr. Kunal Mimani, AOR | ||
- Mr. Kartikey Bhatt, Adv.
- Mr. Gurveer Lally, Adv.
- Mr. Suven bhagat, Adv.
Digitally signed by BALA PARVATHI Date: 2022.08.02 17:15:01 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Application for deleting the names of pro forma respondents is allowed at the risk and responsibility of the petitioner.
Application for permission to file additional documents is allowed.
There is progress in hearing but what is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner is that on various dates there has to be deferment on account of unfortunately some member of the Bar passing away when the resolution is passed by the Bar Association for deferment of hearing. Position is aggravated since the hearing is taken up at 3.30 p.m.
We do believe it may be more convenient if in a matter of this nature, subject to the convenience of the Bench, the hearing commences immediately after the lunch session so that there is continuity in the matter.
List after four weeks.
| [CHARANJEET KAUR] | [POONAM VAID] |
|---|---|
| ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS | COURT MASTER (NSH) |