Moser Baer Energy Development Ltd(Now Porbandar Solar Power Ltd) Through Its Authorised Signatory Manish Verma vs. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd . Through Its General Manager (C0mm. )
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
23 Aug 2017
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.55 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL
Civil Appeal No(s). 10301/2014
GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED Appellant(s)
VERSUS
GUJARAT ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Respondent(s) (Only CA 4037 of 2015 to be listed before the Ld. Registrar Court via R.P Dated 01.05.2017 in Registrar Court No. 2) WITH C.A. No. 4037/2015 (XVII)
Date : 23-08-2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
For Appellant(s)
Sakya Singha Chaudhuri, AOR Hemantika Wahi, AOR Ms. Pragya Ohri, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Deepak Khurana, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co., AOR Naveen Kumar, AOR Rupesh Kumar, AOR Mr. Manish Yadav, Adv. Mr. Rohit Chandra, Adv. Arjun Garg, AOR Ms. Shubhada Kubde, Adv. Hemantika Wahi, AOR Ms. Sonal Gupta, Adv. M/s. Parekh & Co., AOR Anirban Bhattacharya, AOR Nar Hari Singh, AOR Mr. Krutin R. Joshi, Adv. Rajesh Mahale, AOR Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Umesh Kumar Khaitan, AOR Kaushik Poddar, AOR Sakya Singha Chaudhuri, AOR Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR Mr. Madhu Sudan Bhayana, Adv. Shekhar Prit Jha, AOR Manisha T. Karia, AOR Mr. M.N. Marfatia, Adv.
Jitendra Kumar, AOR Ms. Pragya Vats, Adv. N. L. Ganapathi, AOR Bharat Vinod Sharma, AOR Mr. Sahil Narang, Adv. Mr. Karan Dev Chopra, Adv. Mr. A. Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Shashank Mangal, Adv. Ms. Manisha T. Karia, Adv. Ms. Amrita Narayan, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
C.A. No. 10301/2014
Office report not received.
C.A. No. 4037/2015
Respondent Nos.1, 13, 14, 18, 21, 23, 25, 26, 30, 31, 35, 37, 40, 43, 44, 54, 55, 58, 59, 60, 65, 68, 73 and 81 are duly represented.
Respondent No.28 has refused to accept notice, as such, service is deemed to be complete but no one has put in appearance.
Rest of the respondents have been served but no one has entered appearance.
Await statement of case from the parties.
After the expiry of stipulated time for filing statement of case, Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar