State Of Uttaranchal vs. Registrar, Uttaranchal High Court

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO.2795 OF 2002 STATE OF UTTARANCHAL & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUS REGISTRAR, UTTARANCHAL HIGH COURT & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T., directions, impleadment and office report) Date: 20/04/2010 This Appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay,Adv. Ms. Rachana Srivastava,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Rajeev B. Masodkar,Adv. Mr. Anil K. Jha,Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Jayant K. Mehta,Adv. Mr. Nitin Bhatia,Adv. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ajay K. Agrawal,Adv. Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This appeal arises from an interlocutory order. ....2/- - 2 - The counsel appearing for the appellants states that, during the pendency of this appeal, the main matter has been disposed of by the High

¼ITEM NO.107 In COURT NO.5 SECTION X

In view of dismissal of appeal as having become infructuous, no orders are required to be passed on the applications for impleadment and directions.

infructuous. It is dismissed as such.

Court as a result of which this appeal is rendered

[ Alka Dudeja ] [ Neeru Bala Vij ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

[Signed order is placed on the file] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.2795 OF 2002

State of Uttaranchal and Ors. ...Appellant(s)

Versus

Registrar, Uttaranchal High Court and Ors. ...Respondent(s)

O R D E R

This appeal arises from an interlocutory order. The counsel appearing for the appellants states that, during the pendency of this appeal, the main matter has been disposed of by the High Court as a result of which this appeal is rendered infructuous. It is dismissed as such.

......................J. [AFTAB ALAM]

......................J. [K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN]

New Delhi, April 20, 2010.