Lalit Kumar vs. The State Of Jammu And Kashmir Chief Secretary

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:7 Oct 2013
CNR:SCIN010098322013

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

26 Apr 2013

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.70 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10959/2013 TARSEM KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR & ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report ) WITH SLP(C) NO. 19227-19228 of 2013 (With office report) Date: 07/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashok Mathur,Adv. Mr. P.D. Sharma For Respondent(s) Mr.Atul Shankar,adv. Mr. Abhinav Mukerji,Adv. Mrs.Revathy Raghavan ,Adv Mr.Jaswant Singh,adv. Mr. Rana Ranjit Singh Ms.Nidhi,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. Ms.Nidhi advocate appears for respondent Nos.56 and 27 in SLP(C) No.19227-228/13 submits that complete set of the pleadings has not been served on her.

ITEM NO.70 -2-

|

Contd....2

Petitioner is directed to serve complete set of the pleadings within two weeks and file proof. The above respondent shall file counter affidavit within four weeks thereafter.

In SLP(C) No.10959/13 Ms.Revathy Raghavan and Mr.Abhinav Mukerji submit that copy of the pleadings has not been served on them. Petitioner is directed to serve copy of the pleadings on the above respondents within two weeks and file proof. The above respondents shall file counter affidavit within four weeks thereafter.

In SLP(C) No.19227-28/13 also Ms.Revathy Raghavan submits that copy of the pleadings has not been served on her. Petitioner is directed to serve copy of the pleadings within two weeks and file proof. The above respondent shall file counter affidavit within four weeks thereafter.

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(66) - 14 Mar 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(65) - 1 Mar 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(64) - 9 Dec 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(63) - 2 Dec 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(62) - 1 Dec 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(61) - 19 Oct 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(60) - 22 Sept 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(59) - 14 Sept 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(58) - 30 Aug 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(57) - 4 Nov 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(56) - 29 Jul 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(55) - 1 Jul 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(54) - 13 Apr 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(53) - 6 Apr 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(52) - 5 Mar 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(51) - 2 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(50) - 4 Jan 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(48) - 24 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(49) - 24 Nov 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(47) - 6 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(46) - 18 Sept 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(45) - 25 Aug 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(44) - 5 Jul 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(42) - 25 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(43) - 25 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(40) - 8 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(41) - 8 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(38) - 22 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 22 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(36) - 16 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(37) - 16 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(34) - 8 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(35) - 8 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(32) - 11 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 11 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 19 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 19 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 4 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 16 Nov 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 16 Nov 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 26 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 26 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 12 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 12 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 12 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 1 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 1 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 18 Sept 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 18 Sept 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 31 Jul 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 31 Jul 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 14 May 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(15) - 14 May 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(12) - 2 Feb 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 2 Feb 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 8 Jan 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(9) - 17 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 17 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 7 Aug 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 7 Jul 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 13 Feb 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 7 Oct 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(4) - 7 Aug 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 7 May 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 6 May 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 1 Apr 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data