Abdul Alim Mondal vs. The State Of Assam Chief Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Hon'ble Prashant Kumar Mishra
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
4 Feb 2025
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
19526/2024,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.17 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).9570/2018
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-02-2017 in WA No.44/2017 passed by the Gauhati High Court]
ABDUL ALIM MONDAL Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 19526/2024 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
WITH
SLP(C) No.5392/2019 (XIV)
(IA No. 111212/2024 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 27166/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 25789/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES)
Date : 02-04-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. B.K. Sharma, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Raka Bejoy Phukan, Adv.<br>Ms. Neha Tandon, Adv.<br>Mr. Bharadwaj S., AOR |
|---|---|
| Mr. Partha Sil, AOR<br>Ms. Sayani Bhattacharya, Adv.<br>Mr. Srijit Datta, Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Chinmoi Pradeep Sharma, Sr. A.A.G. |
| Mr. Debojit Borkakati, AOR<br>Mr. Krishna Jyoti Deka, Adv.<br>Mr. Irfan Hasieb, Adv.<br>Mr. Vijay Deora, Adv. | |
Ms. Nidhi, AOR
Mr. Rahul Pratap, AOR Ms. Atiga Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Jaiswal, Adv. Mr. Piyush Vyas, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(C) No.9570 of 2018
Though a valiant effort has been made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner but we do not find any substance warranting interference in the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court. Accordingly, the Special Leave Petition stands dismissed.
2. However, the present order shall not prejudice the petitioner for any other job to which he may apply, which shall be considered on its own merits in accordance with law.
3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
SLP(C) No.5392 of 2019
Having been taken through the pleadings on record and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, we do not find it a fit case where interference is required in the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court. Accordingly, the Special Leave Petition stands dismissed.
2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAPNA BISHT) (ANJALI PANWAR)