Laxman Diwan vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.3 SECTION X
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 175/2022
MOHD. NASEER Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ANR.Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.66917/2022-GRANT OF BAIL ) WITH W.P.(Crl.) No. 222/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.82534/2022-INTERIM BAIL) SLP(Crl) No. 5709/2022 (II-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. IA No. 85410/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 21-07-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA For Petitioner(s) Ms. Malvika Trivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Swarnendu Chatterjee, AOR Mr. Himanshu Nailwad, Adv. Ms. Pracheta Kar, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sidhna, Adv. Mr. Yashwardhan Singh, Adv. Ms. Deepakshi Garg, Adv. Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv. Mr. Gaurav, AOR Mr. Sharad Chauhan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta LD SG Mr. S.V. Raju, Ld. ASG Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Kanu agarwal, Adv Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv Ms. Sairica S. Raju, Adv. Digitally signed by DEEPAK SINGH Date: 2022.07.23 16:02:17 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
W.P.(Crl) No(s). 175/2022 and SLP(Crl.) No. 5709 of 2022
In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the respondent seeking adjournment on the ground of nonavailability of Mr. S.V. Raju, learned Additional Solicitor General, list these matters on 28.07.2022.
W.P.(Crl.) No. 222/2022
A request for adjournment is made on the ground of nonavailability of Mr. S.V. Raju, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the respondent-Union of India.
It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that the adjournment was taken in the past by the respondent(s) and there is some urgency involved.
By way of indulgence, we defer the hearing of these matters till next week, to be taken on 28.07.2022.
Pendency of this matter will not deprive the petitioner to mention the matter before the concerned Judge of the High Court where the bail application is still reportedly pending for pronouncement of judgment, including before the Chief Justice of the High Court for appropriate directions, if so advised.
(DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI)
2
