Laxman Diwan vs. Union Of India

<pre>Court 1 (Video Conferencing)</pre> ITEM NO.14 SECTION II-B

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

$\mathbf{1}$

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).6847/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-08-2021 in CRMM No.34959/2021 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)

SURENDER SINGH

Petitioner(s)

Respondent $(s)$

VERSUS

THE STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.113593/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.114617/2021-APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION)

Date: 01-10-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

For Petitioner(s)	Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr.Adv.
	Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr.Adv.
	Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv.
	Mr. Anshuman Srivastava, Adv.
	Mr. Prasouk Jain, Adv.
	Ms. Rabiya Thakur, Adv.
	Ms. Devika Mohan, Adv.
	Mr. Nishant Rao, Adv.
	Mr. Anmol Kheta, Adv.
	Mr. Shezaan Hashmi, Adv.
	Mr. Rajeev Gupta, Adv.
	Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR
For Respondent(s)	Mr. S.V. Raju, ASG
	Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Adv.
	Ms. Sairica Raju, Adv.
	Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv.
ature Not Verified	Mr. Shantanu Sharma, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following 0 R D F R

The Court is convened through Video Conferencing.

Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR

During the course of hearing, Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the main accused and the co-accused have been granted bail by this Court.

In view of the above, list the instant matter before the Bench which have heard SLP(Crl.)No.618 of 2020.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (R.S. NARAYANAN) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)