Laxman Diwan vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.10 Court 1 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II-C
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 4813/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-01-2021 in CRLOP No. 6809/2020 and 21-01-2021 in CRLOP No. 6815/2020 and 21-11-2019 in CRLMP No. 15541/2019 in Crl.O.P. No. 7642 of 2019 and 02-08-2019 in CRLOP No. 7642/2019 and 02-08-2019 in CRLOP No. 7645/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras)
ACHIN AGGARWAL ETC.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE & ANR. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.29378/2021-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.29382/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.29380/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.29381/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )
Date: 02-03-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
| For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR<br>Mr. Selvin Raja, Adv.<br>Mr. Arindam Ghosh, Adv.<br>Mr. Arya Tripathi, Adv. | |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) Mr. S.V. Raju, ASG<br>Ms. Sairica Raju, Adv.<br>$M_{12} \qquad A_{12} \qquad A_{22} \qquad A_{3} \qquad A_{3} \qquad A_{4} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad A_{5} \qquad$ |
Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv.
- Mr. Guntur Pramod Kumar, Adv.
- Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0$ R D F R
🛰 Verified Heard Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing on 16:43 behalf of the petitioner.
Permission to file SLP(s) is granted.
Delay condoned.
Issue notice.
There shall be interim stay of the impugned order(s) and the amount already recovered shall remain with the respondent(s) in the meanwhile.
Tag with SLP(Crl.)No. 4322-4324 of 2019.
(MADHU BALA) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL) AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR