Laxman Diwan vs. Union Of India

ITEM NO.9 COURT NO. $7$ SECTION II-B SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)..... CRLMP No(s). 6051/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-12-2016 in WPCRL No. 333/2015 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam) KISHIN S. LOUNGANI Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent $(s)$ $(FOR)$ CONDONATION $\mathbf{OF}$ ${\tt DELAY}$ $\mathbf{IN}$ FILING $\mathtt{SLP}$ $\quad\text{and}\quad$ CRLMP No.75597/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION) Date: 22-08-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. Manali Singhal, Adv. Ms. Vinita Sasidharan, Adv. Mr. Rohit Kaul, Adv. For Mr. Amit K. Nain, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar, SG Mr. P. S. Narsimha, ASG Mr. Binu Tamta, Adv.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. P. B. Suresh, Adv. Mr. Vipin Nair, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

At the joint request of learned counsel appearing for the parties, three weeks' time is granted to file reply and one week's time to file rejoinder thereafter.

List the matter after four weeks.

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks permission withdraw the application for intervention and to file $t_0$ substantive petition against order dated 14.12.2016 passed by the High Court in Criminal Writ Petition No.3931 of 2016.

Permission is granted.<br>Signature Not Verified

Crl.M.P.No.75597 of 2017 for intervention is, therefore, Tismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

(RASHI GUPTA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT