Sunil Kumar Sharma vs. The State Of Bihar The Commissioner Cum Principal Secretary Health And Family Welfare The State Of Bihar Health And Family Welfare

ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).11885/2012

(Arising out of final judgment and order dated 12.07.2011 in LPA No.261 of 2008 passed by the Patna High Court)

THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

DEVENDRA SHARMA Respondent(s)

WITH

SLP(C) No. 2930/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 2914/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 3306/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 3352/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 2755/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 5983/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 7571/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 7574/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 7569/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 7577/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 7564/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 7562/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 7560/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 7568/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 2191/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 2042/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 20582/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 5964/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 8229/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 18198/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 10397/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 11886/2012 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 6837/2016 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 24742/2012 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 24749/2012 (XVI) (WITH IA No.76851/2017-I A FOR BRINING ON RECRDS FACTS AND DEVEP.) SLP(C) No. 11366/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 24744/2012 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 11887/2012 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 24743/2012 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 24745/2012 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 24753/2012 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 14694/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 24518/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 20033/2012 (XVI) (WITH IA No.57184/2017-XTRA and IA No.68960/2017-impleading party Digitally signed by SANJAY KUMAR Date: 2017.11.15 17:01:12 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

and IA No.95965/2017-impleading party and IA No.116429/2017-impleading party) SLP(C) No. 20036/2012 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 20038/2012 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 18197/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 22300/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 24748/2012 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 23837/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 25895/2015 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 36406/2016 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 28306/2014 (XVI) (WITH IA No.81500/2017-VACATING STAY In Connected Case SLP(C) No.003431-003431/2017 and IA No.77712/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. In Connected Case SLP(C) No.035375-035375/2014 and IA No.77710/2017-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION In Connected Case SLP(C) No.035375-035375/2014 and and IA No.69266/2017-impleading party and IA No.69268/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.69279/2017-impleading party and IA No.69280/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.69287/2017-impleading party and IA No.69288/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.77045/2017-impleading party and IA No.77049/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.78335/2017-impleading party and IA No.78337/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.78345/2017-impleading party and IA No.78349/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.79251/2017-impleading party and IA No.79253/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.79255/2017-impleading party and IA No.79256/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.79270/2017-impleading party and IA No.79273/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 32024/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 30707/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 29303-29310/2014 (XVI) (WITH IA No.72293/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.72294/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 29399/2014 (XVI) (WITH IA No.72283/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.72284/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 29496/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 29490-29492/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 31562/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 34248/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 30732/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 32033/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 29940-29941/2014 (XVI) (WITH IA No.77670/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION and IA No.77673/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 30704/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 31218/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 157/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 2190/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 155/2014 (XVI) SLP(C) No. 160/2014 (XVI)

SLP(C) No. 161/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 150/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 162/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 32590/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 34132/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 158/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 159/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 152/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 156/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 151/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 32645/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 33131/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 32673/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 32614/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 33051/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 34818-34820/2014 (XVI)
(WITH IA No.77654/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION
and IA No.77656/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
SLP(C) No. 33708/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 67/2015 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 34280/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 34667/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 34668/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 35375/2014 (XVI)
(WITH IA No.77712/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION
APPLN. and IA No.77710/2017-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION)
SLP(C) No. 36513/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 9/2015 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 2192/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 2193/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 3280/2015 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 36755/2014 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 3431/2017 (XVI)
(WITH IA No.81500/2017-VACATING STAY and and IA
No.81501/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
SLP(C) No. 923-924/2015 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 9534/2016 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 31452/2015 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 2573/2015 (XVI)
SLP(C) No. 28728-28729/2017 (XVI)
(WITH IA No.101181/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA
No.101182/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 14-11-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
For Petitioner(s)
 Mr. Navin Prakash, AOR

Mr. Binay Kumar Das, AOR Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, Adv. Mr. Jamnesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, AOR Mr. A.K. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Abhishekh Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. K. V. Mohan, AOR Mr. Gopal Singh, AOR Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. Mr. Manu Shanker Mishra, AOR Mr. Ravikesh K. Sinha, Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, AOR Mr. Parmanand Gaur, AOR Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR Mr. Yatinte Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Vinay Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.K. Pabbi, Adv. Ms. Shikha Roy, Adv. Ms. Disha Singh, Adv. Mr. Shivendu Gaur, Adv. Mr. Bipin K. Jha, Adv. Mr. Ojasvi Khaneja, Adv. Mr. Amit Sudan, Adv. Mr. M.K. Chandnany, Adv. Mr. K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Talesara, AOR Mr. Saurabh Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR Ms. Akanksha Verma Chandok, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Adv. Mr. A. P. Mohanty, AOR Ms. Sandhya Tiwary, Adv. Mr. Ashok Tiwary, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, AOR

Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pallav Shishodia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Adv. Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. A.K. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Abhishekh Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, AOR Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur, AOR Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, AOR Mr. Brahma Kumar Pathak, Adv. Ms. Sangita, Adv. Ms. Sarita, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR Mr. Girindra Kumar Pathak, Adv. Mr. Shivram Singh, Adv. Mr. Ramnandan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shakeel Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai, AOR Mr. Shantanu Sagar, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Raj, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Upadhyay, Adv. Dr. S.K. Verma, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Verma Chandok, Adv. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, AOR Ms. Bihu Sharma, Adv. Ms. Purnima Krishna, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Garg, Adv. Mr. Gopal Singh, AOR Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Shivam Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Raina, Adv. Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, AOR Mr. Manu Shanker Mishra, AOR Ms. Kawaljit Kaur Dang, Adv. Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, AOR

Mr. Devendra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Prem Sunder Jha, AOR Mr. Rajesh Prasad Singh, AOR Mr. R. D. Upadhyay, AOR Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Sunil Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, AOR Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Ms. Archana Kumari, Adv. Mr. Jamnesh Kumar, Adv. Ms. Sweety Singh, Adv. Ms. Rohini Prasad, Adv. Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma, AOR Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Das, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. Binay Kumar Das, AOR Mr. Smarhar Singh, Adv. Mr. Shantanu Sagar, AOR Mr. Kusum Chaudhary, AOR Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri, AOR Mr. Shikhil Suri, Adv. Ms. Tajinder Virdi, Adv. Ms. Shilpa Saini, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, AOR Mr. K. V. Mohan, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Most of the respondents were working for more than a decade and the view of the State Government is that they were illegally appointed. They were paid salary for more than a decade and it seems that no action has been taken

6

against those persons who made the appointment and who made the payments.

Learned counsel for the State says that as far as his information goes, action has been taken against the concerned persons. He should file an affidavit indicating the exact status of the persons, who are involved in the entire controversy and what action has been taken against them.

The affidavit be filed within four weeks from today. It is made clear that no further time will be granted.

List the matters immediately after four weeks.

AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

(SANJAY KUMAR-I) (KAILASH CHANDER)