Soeta Motors vs. State Of Punjab
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
22 Apr 2013
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 14814/2013 (From the judgement and order dated 20/12/2012 in CWP No.9853/2006, of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) THE LUXMI CO-OP. TPT SOC. & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to file SLP and office report )) Date: 26/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sandeep S. Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Yogendra Kumar Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Sarmesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Sameer Singh Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file special leave petition is granted. Delay condoned. Issue notice. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. In the meanwhile, the operation of the impugned judgment shall remain stayed. However, it is made clear that if the petitioners' permits are operative and currently valid, then only they shall be entitled to operate their vehicles as per the permits. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 17238-
|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) |
17251 of 2013.
ð
|Court Master | |Court Master |