Credit Suisse Ag vs. Ajay Singh

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hima Kohli, Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:14 Aug 2023
CNR:SCIN010094492023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

Before:

Hon'ble Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Hon'ble Aravind Kumar

Stage:

FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

Notice, List On (Date) [11-09-2023], Notice Returnable [D:0,W:4,M:0]

Listed On:

14 Aug 2023

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.14 SECTION XII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 822/2023 in SLP(C) No. 1046/2022

CREDIT SUISSE AG & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

AJAY SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION )

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 823/2023 in SLP(C) No. 1082/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 824/2023 in SLP(C) No. 1119/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION)

Date : 14-08-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Dave, Sr. Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR Mr. Rajendra Barot, Adv. Ms. Rajendra Barot, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Shetty, Adv. Mr. Ayush Chaddha, Adv. Mr. Prastut Dalvi, Adv. Ms. Vasudha Jain, Adv. Ms. Mallika Agarwal, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Shyam Diwan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have heard Shri Siddharth Dave, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and Shri Shyam Diwan, learned senior counsel for the respondents. Signature Not Verified

2. Learned senior counsel for the respondents submitted that the Court may not issue Rule in the matter of contempt, as there has Digitally signed by Neetu Sachdeva Date: 2023.08.16 16:31:34 IST Reason:

contd..

been some payments made, though not strictly as per the schedule. 3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submitted that the Court had granted indulgence and withdrawn the Airlines from liquidation only in view of the Consent Terms dated 23.05.2022, by which 500,000 US dollars was to be paid every month by the respondents to the petitioners from July 15, 2020. It was submitted that, though as of now more than 6.5 million US dollars has to be deposited, but only a little over 2 million US dollars has been deposited.

4. Having regard to the aforesaid, we find it a fit case to issue Rule in the matter of contempt against the respondents.

5. Accordingly, Rule in the matter of contempt is issued to the respondents.

6. The matter be listed for further consideration on 11.09.2023.

(NEETU SACHDEVA) (MALEKAR NAGARAJ) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(14) - 9 May 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 22 Apr 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 25 Oct 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 29 Jul 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 22 Mar 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 19 Feb 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 4 Dec 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 20 Oct 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 22 Sept 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 11 Sept 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 14 Aug 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(3) - 25 Jul 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 17 May 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 21 Apr 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view