A1 Recreation Club Rep By Its Secretary P. Kannan vs. I. Mohammed Razvi

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:16 Apr 2018
CNR:SCIN010092552018

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

FRESH

Before:

Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice

Stage:

FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

Disposed off

Listed On:

16 Apr 2018

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

SLP(C)No.8793/18 1

ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.1 SECTION XII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).8793/2018

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-12-2017 in WPMD No.12915/2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras At Madurai)

A1 RECREATION CLUB Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

I. MOHAMMED RAZVI & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No.48822/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

Date : 16-04-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD

For Petitioner(s) Mr. G.Sivabalamurugan, AOR Mr.A.Vasantha Kumar, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Heard Mr.G.Sivabalamurugan, learned counsel for the petitioner.

It is submitted by Mr.Sivabalamurugan that no enquiry has been conducted as against the petitioner.

In view of the aforesaid, we grant liberty to the petitioner to file an application for review before the High Court within four weeks hence, and request the High Court to dispose of the review on merits instead of throwing it away at the threshold on the ground of limitation. In case the petitioner does not Digitally signed by CHETAN KUMAR Date: 2018.04.17 17:24:57 TLT Reason: Signature Not Verified

succeed in review, liberty is granted to it to approach this Court challenging the main order as well as the order passed in review.

With the aforesaid liberty, the special leave petition stands disposed of.

As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.

(Chetan Kumar ) (H.S.Parasher) Court Master Assistant Registrar