Sirigina @ Balusu Venkata Sharmila vs. Sirigina Sivanand
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
After Week/Month/Vacation
Before:
Hon'ble V. Ramasubramanian
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Case Allowed
Listed On:
16 Aug 2022
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
50489/2021,50811/2021,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 816/2021
SIRIGINA @ BALUSU VENKATA SHARMILA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SIRIGINA SIVANAND Respondent(s)
(mediation report alongwith settlement agreement received. IA No. 50489/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 50811/2021 - STAY APPLICATION)
Date : 16-08-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vimayshree Pattnaik. Adv Mr. Sadineni Ravi Kumar, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
The Transfer Petition is allowed in terms of the signed order.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(PAWAN DALAL) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (SH)
[Signed order is placed on the file]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
TRANSFER PETITION (C) No. 816/2021
SIRIGINA @ BALUSU VENKATA SHARMILA PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
SIRIGINA SIVANAND RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
This is the Petition filed by the Wife seeking transfer of the Petition for divorce filed by the Respondent-husband, now pending in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Tanuku, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
The Petitioner is seeking the transfer of the said proceedings to a Court of competent jurisdiction namely the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, Telangana State.
The parties were referred to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre, after completion of service. The Supreme court Mediation Centre has filed a Report stating that both parties agreed to bury their differences. But when an agreement was drafted, the Respondent refused to sign the agreement.
In other words, the Mediation did not prove to be fruitful. Today the respondent has also not appeared either in-person or through counsel.
Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances, the transfer petition is allowed.
...............................J. [V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN]
New Delhi; August 16, 2022.