The State Of Maharashtra Police Station Officer vs. Rajesh Shyamrao Wankhede

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, L. Nageswara Rao
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:7 May 2018
CNR:SCIN010091532018

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

Item No.79 1

REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION II-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR

IA 44383/2018,44384/2018,44386/2018, in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2738/2018

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Petitioner(s)

SLP(CRL)NO. 2738/2018

Digitally signed by MADHU GROVER Date: 2018.05.08

Signature Not Verified

VERSUS

M/S. SHIV RATAN FILLING STATION & ORS. Respondent(s)

([TO BE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH ITEM NO. 6 I.E. SLP(CRL)NO.2625/2018] )

WITH

SLP(Crl) No. 2742-2748/2018 (II-A) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 44432/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 44435/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 44436/2018)

Date : 07-05-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Samrat Krishnarao Shinde,Adv. Mr. Rishi Jain, AOR Mr. Parijat Sinha,Adv. Ms. Reshmi Rea Sinha,Adv. Mr. Rudra Dutta,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.2 and 3 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. 09:42:21 TLT Reason:

Await the return of the service of notice already issued to

the respondent No.1. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file dasti proof also.

SLP(Crl) Nos. 2742-2748/2018

Four weeks time is given to the respondent Nos. 1, 2 to 6 and 8 to file pleadings, if any.

Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.7, 11 and 12 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.

Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No.15. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file dasti proof also.

As per postal tracking report notices issued to the respondent Nos. 9 and 14 have been received back with postal remarks "Insufficient address" and in respect of respondent Nos. 10 and 13 have been received back with remarks "Door Locked". Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the said respondents and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to them within the same period.

However, Ms. Reshmi Rea Sinha, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Parijat Sinha, Ld. Advocate-on Record seeks and is given two weeks time to file the vakalatnama and four weeks time to file the counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 12 and 15.

List again on 27.7.2018.

SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar

MG

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(19) - 30 Jan 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 17 Nov 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 28 Apr 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 15 Mar 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 2 Feb 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 10 Dec 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 26 Oct 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 31 Aug 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 10 Feb 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 10 Jan 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 3 Dec 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 13 Sept 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 27 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 7 May 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(6) - 7 May 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(4) - 2 Apr 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(3) - 9 Mar 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 23 Feb 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 19 Feb 2018

ROP

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Search in District Courts Data