Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Ltd vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh Sugar Industry And Cane Development Department Through The Principal Secretry

0ITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 4928/2016 UTTARAKHAND SUGAR MILLS ASSN. AND ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS Respondent(s) Date : 02/03/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Vishal Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Rachna Gandhi,Adv. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. B.L.Shivhare,Adv. Mr. S.N. Terdal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. Counsel for the appellants and Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 3 have failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period. However, s ervice is complete. Filing of Statement of Case is not mandatory as per amended Supreme Court Rules, 2013. S ervice of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 8 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, Ms. Rachna Gandhi , Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent No.1. She seeks and is given one week's time to file the vakalatnama and four weeks time to file the counter affidavit. After expiry of said period, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court.

(M V RAMESH) Registrar

MG