Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Ltd vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh Sugar Industry And Cane Development Department Through The Principal Secretry

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURA

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10134/2012

EAST U.P.SUGAR MILLS ASSN.& ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and prayer for interim relief and office report )

WITH SLP(C) NOS. 25696, 27872/2012

Date: 03/04/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.

• For Petitioner(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Mrs. Priya Puri ,Adv. Ms. Kausturika Das,Adv. Mr. Deeptakirti Verma,Adv. Mr. Vishal Gupta,Adv. Mr. Kumar Mihir,Adv.
• For Respondent(s) Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad,Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. Caveator-In-Person ,Adv. Mrs. Priya Puri,Adv. Ms. Aakanksha Nehra,Adv. M/s Parekh & Co.,Advs. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. Anilendra Kant Srivastava,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C)No.10134/2012 The Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 are present. ..2/-

Item No. 15 - 2 -

The learned counsel for the appearing respondents seeks and is granted four weeks' time for filing the counter affidavit.

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent No. 5 and 6 by usual mode. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served.

SLP(C)No. 25696/2012 The Learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 34 are present. The learned counsel for the appearing respondents seeks and is granted four weeks' time for filing the counter affidavit. The served respondents may also file their Counter affidavit before the next date, in case they choose to do so. The learned counsel for the respondent No.4 shall be directed to provide the copy of the counter affidavit to the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of two weeks. List both matters again on 25.7.2014 SLP(C)No.27872/2012

The learned counsel for the petitioner is present. None for the respondents. What gets revealed from the perusal of the Office Report is that although by Order dated 16.1.2014 of this Court the learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to take fresh steps for the service of notice to all

Item No. 15 - 3 -

..3/-

the unserved respondents, as last chance yet the learned counsel for the petitioner has not done the needful so far. Therefore, the matter shall be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.

(M.K. HANJURA) mg Registrar