Branded Edible Oil Manufactures Association Through Its Authorised Representative Mr. Suresh M. S. Jagirdarthrough Its Director vs. Sanjeev Kumar
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
LISTED ON: 26.08.2016 BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT NO: 1
ITEM NO: 13
SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 2146/2014, 13686/15 & 13687-13689/2015
RETAILORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA ...PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF H.P. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS
OFFICE REPORT
The matters above mentioned were listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 25.04.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:-
"SLP(C) NO.2146/2014
Last opportunity of three weeks is granted for filing affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent no.6.
None appears for respondent nos. 3 and 5 despite due service.
Respondent nos. 1,2 and 4 have been declined the opportunity to file counter affidavit. SLP(C) NO.13686/2015
None appears for respondent no.3 despite due service.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on the remaining respondents within two weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. SLP(C) NO.13687-13689/2015
Last opportunity of two weeks is granted for furnishing fresh address of respondent nos. 5 and 8 in SLP(C) NO.13687-88/2015. Notices thereafter be issued.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps in respect of respondent nos. 6 and 7 in SLP(C) NO.13687-88/2015 and respondent nos. 3 to 6 in SLP(C) NO.13689/2015. Notices thereafter be issued. List again on 4.8.2016."
SLP(C)No.2146/2014
It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has still not filed Affidavit with proof of dasti service in respect of respondent No. 6 so far. Ms. Pragati Neekhra and Mr. Shadan Farasat, Advocates have filed Vakalatnama and Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 but they have not filed
Counter Affidavit so far. No one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos.3 and 5 though served with dasti notice.
Service is not complete in respect of respondent No. 6. SLP(C)No.13686/2015
It is submitted that as directed vide Court's Order dated 25.04.2016, fresh show cause notice to respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 to 6 was issued on 18.05.2016 by regd. A.D. Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance as well as counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Shadan Farasat, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent No. 3 but he has not filed counter affidavit so far. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover has been received in respect of respondent Nos. 4 to 6.
Service is not complete.
SLP(C) Nos. 13687-13689/2015
It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not furnished the fresh address of respondent Nos. 5 and 8 in SLP(C) No. 13687 and 13688/2015. Fresh show cause notice to respondent Nos. 6-7 in SLP(C) No. 13667-68/2015 and respondent Nos. 4, 5, 6 in SLP(C) No. 13689/2015 was issued on 14.05.2016 by regd. A.D. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover has been received from respondent Nos. 6 to 7 in SLP(C) Nos. 13687 and 13688/2015 and respondent Nos. 4 to 6 in SLP(C) No. 13689/2015 so far. Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 1-2 in all matters and Respondent No. 3 in SLP (C) No. 13687-13688 of 2015 has not filed counter-affidavit so far. No one has entered appearance on behalf of respondent No. 4 in SLP(C) Nos. 13687-13688/2015 though served with notice.
Service is not complete.
The matters above mentioned are listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report.
DATED THIS THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST, 2016.
COPY TO: 1. Mr. Abhinav Mukherjee, Adv Ch. No. 2. M/s. Dua Associates, Adv Ch. No. 3. Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv Ch. No. 4. Mr. Shadan Farasat, Adv Ch. No. 5. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv Ch. No.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
P-1