Branded Edible Oil Manufactures Association Through Its Authorised Representative Mr. Suresh M. S. Jagirdarthrough Its Director vs. Sanjeev Kumar
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
LISTED ON: 10.02.2016
BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT NO: 1
ITEM NO: 26
SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 2146/2014, 13686/15 & 13687-13689/2015
RETAILORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA ...PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF H.P. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS
OFFICE REPORT
The matters above mentioned were listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 24.11.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:-
"SLP(C) NO.2146/2014
Petitioner has still not filed affidavit as proof of dasti service for respondent no.6. Ld. Counsel has requested one weeks time for the same. Be filed as assured.
Opportunity for respondent nos. 1,2 and 4 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.
Service of respondent nos. 3 and 5 is complete but none has entered appearance.
SLP(C) NO.13686/2015
Service of all the six respondents is still awaited.
SLP(C) NO.13687-13689/2015
Respondent nos. 1 and 2 in all these matters and of respondent no.3 in SLP(C) No. 13687, 13688 of 2015 have not filed counter affidavit. It already was the warning of last opportunity for the purpose. Further opportunity is hereby declined.
Service upon respondent no.4 is complete but none has entered appearance.
Respondent nos. 5 to 8 in SLP(C) No. 13687, 13688 of 2015 and respondent nos. 3 to 6 in SLP(C) No. 13689/2015 are not yet served. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps within four weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued.
List again on 10.2.2016."
SLP(C)No.2146/2014
It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has still not filed Affidavit with proof of dasti service in respect of respondent No. 6 so far. Ms. Pragati Neekhra and Mr. Shadan Farasat, Advocates have filed Vakalatnama and Appearance on
behalf of Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 but they have not filed Counter Affidavit so far. No one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos.3 and 5 though served with dasti notice.
Service is not complete in respect of respondent No. 6.
SLP(C)No.13686/2015
It is submitted tha neither AD Card nor unserved cover has been received from all the six respondents so far.
Service is not complete.
SLP(C) Nos. 13687-13689/2015
It is submitted that fresh show cause notice to respondent Nos. 5 to 8 in SLP(C) Nos. 13687 and 13688/2015 and respondent Nos. 3 to 8 in SLP(C) No. 13689/2015 was issued on 04.01.2016 by regd. A.D. Unserved covers have been received from respondent Nos. 5 and 8 in SLP(C) No. 13687 and 13688/2015 without any postal remarks against respondent No. 5 and "No such person found" against respondent No. 8. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover has been received from respondent Nos. 6 to 8 in SLP(C) Nos. 13687 and 13688/2015 and respondent Nos. 3 to 6 in SLP(C) No. 13689/2015 so far. Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 1-2 in all matters and Respondent No. 3 in SLP (C) No. 13687-13688 of 2015 has not filed counter-affidavit so far. No one has entered appearance on behalf of respondent No. 4 in SLP(C) Nos. 13687-13688/2015 though served with notice.
Service is not complete.
The matters above mentioned are listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report.
DATED THIS THE 9th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
COPY TO:
- Mr. Abhinav Mukherjee, Adv Ch. No. 2. M/s. Dua Associates, Adv Ch. No. 3. Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv Ch. No. 4. Mr. Shadan Farasat, Adv Ch. No. 5. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv Ch. No.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
P-1