State Of M. P vs. Renu Khemani
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
14 Jul 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Item No. 69
SECTION IVA REGISTRAR COURT. 2
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 33987/2013
STATE OF M.P. & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SANJAY SHRIVASTAVA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and exemption from filing $0.T.$ )
WITH SLP(C) No. $34812/2013$ (With Office Report) $SLP(C)$ No. 34813/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. $34814/2013$ (With Office Report) $SLP(C)$ No. 34815/2013 (With Office Report) $SLP(C)$ No. 21831/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for <pre>c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)</pre> $SLP(C)$ No. 22600/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and appln.(s) for <pre>c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report)</pre>
Date : $19/09/2014$ These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh, Adv.
Mr. R. C. Kohli, Adv.
$\mathbf{1}$
Mr. Vinod Prasad,Adv. Mr. Akshat Shrivastava,Adv. Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rathore,Adv. Ms. Ishu Prayash,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(C) Nos.33987,34812,34813,34814 and 34815/2013
The office report is that although by Order dated 17.7.2014 of this Court the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 in SLP(C) Nos. 33987, 34812 and 34813/2013 and respondent Nos.1 and 2 in SLP(C) Nos. 34814 and 34815/2013 were given six weeks time as last chance for filing the counter affidavit, yet they have not done the needful so far. Therefore no further opportunity is warranted to be given to them on that count taking into consideration the rule position.
The office report proceeds to state that although by the same order dated 17.7.2014 three weeks time, as last chance was given to the learned counsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of the office report, yet he has not done the needful so far. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.
SLP(C) Nos. 21831 and 22600/2014
Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondents.
List again on 8.12.2014.
(M K HANJURA) Registrar
MG
2