State Of U. P. vs. H. K. Enterprises
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL © NOS. 9723, 11303, 11304, 11305, 11307, 11310, 11311, 11312 AND 25422 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
State of U.P. & Ors. …Petitioners
Versus
M/s Bajrang Coal Dipo & Anr. Etc. ...Respondents
OFFICE REPORT
The office report abovementioned was listed before Ld. Registrar's Court on 14th March, 2016 when the following order was passed:
"SLP(C) No. 9723/2014
Fresh steps to be taken for service of both the respondents within four weeks.
SLP(C) No. 11303/2014
Two weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to the petitioner for filing spare copies of the petition. Notice thereafter be issued to respondent Nos.3 and 4.
Nobody appears for respondent Nos.1 and 2, despite due service.
SLP(C) No. 11304/2014
Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent Nos.1, 2, 5 to 9 and 12 within four weeks.
Nobody appears for respondent No.10, despite due service. Registry to report the status of the other respondents.
SLP(C) No. 11305/2014
Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent Nos.1, 3, 4, 6 and 8 to 11 within four weeks.
Nobody appears for respondent No.5, despite due service. Registry to report the status of the other respondents.
SLP(C) No. 11307/2014
Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent Nos.6, 7 and 8 within four weeks.
Nobody appears for respondent No.4, despite due service. Registry to report the status of the other respondents.
SLP(C) No. 11310/2014
Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent Nos.2, 11 and
12 within four weeks.
Respondent Nos.1, 8 and 9 have already filed the counter affidavit.
Nobody appears for respondent Nos.3 to 7, 10 and 13 to 21, despite due service.
SLP(C) No. 11311/2014
Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent Nos.4, 5 and 8 to 12 within four weeks.
Nobody appears for respondent Nos.1 to 3, 6 and 7, despite due service.
SLP(C) No. 11312/2014
Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent No.5 within four weeks.
Nobody appears for respondent Nos.1 to 4, despite due service.
SLP(C) No. 25422/2014
Nobody appears for both the respondents, despite due service. List again on 17.3.2016."
SLP © No. 9723 of 2014
It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not taken any fresh steps for service of notice on both the respondents so far.
SLP © No.11303 of 2014
It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed copies of SLP so far. Hence, fresh show cause notice could not be issued to unserved respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
It is further submitted that A.D. card duly signed has been received back from respondent Nos. 1 & 2 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said respondent so far.
SLP © No. 11304 OF 2014
It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed copies of SLP so far. Hence, fresh show cause notice could not be issued to unserved respondent Nos. 1, 2, 5 to 9 and 12. A.D. card duly signed has been received back from Respondent Nos. 3, 4, 10 and 11 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said respondents so far.
SLP © No. 11305 OF 2014
It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed copies of SLP so far. Hence, fresh show cause notice could not be issued to unserved respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4, 6 and 8 to 11. A.D. card duly signed has been received back from Respondent Nos. 2, 5, 7, 12, 13 and 14 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said respondents so far.
SLP © No. 11307 OF 2014
It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed copies of SLP so far. Hence, fresh show cause notice could not be issued to unserved respondent Nos. 6, 7 and 8. A.D. card duly signed has been received back from Respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 9 and 10 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said respondents so far.
SLP © No. 11310 OF 2014
It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed copies of SLP so far. Hence, fresh show cause notice could not be issued to unserved respondent Nos. 2, 11 and 12. A.D. card duly signed has been received back from Respondent Nos. 3 to 7, 10, 13 to 21 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said respondents so far.
It is further submitted that Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance & counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1, 8 & 9.
SLP © No. 11311 OF 2014
It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed copies of SLP so far. Hence, fresh show cause notice could not be issued to unserved respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 8 to 12. A.D. card duly signed has been received back from Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said respondents so far.
SLP © No. 11312 OF 2014
It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed copies of SLP so far. Hence, fresh show cause notice could not be issued to unserved respondent No. 5. A.D. card duly signed has been received back from Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said respondents so far.
SLP © No. 25422 OF 2014
It is submitted that A.D. card duly signed have been received back from both the respondents but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said respondents so far.
The office report is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court for orders. Dated this the 16th day of March, 2016.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to :
-
- Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Advocate 12 Old Lawyer's Chamber
-
- Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate 118, Lawyers Chambers.
c3
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR