Amarjit Debbarma vs. The State Of Tripura

ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No.1298/2020

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-10-2019 in WP(C) No.1040/2019 passed by the High Court Of Tripura At Agarthala)

AJOY DEBBARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF TRIPURA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R.; and, IA No.7915/2020 – FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION)

WITH SLP(C) No.1125/2020 (XIV) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)

Diary No.1324/2020 (XIV) (IA No.10727/2020 – FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING; IA No.10728/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT; and, IA No.10725/2020 – FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION)

Diary No.1348/2020 (XIV) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.; IA No.9870/2020 – FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING; IA No.9871/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT; and, IA No.9868/2020 – FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION)

Diary No.2268/2020 (XIV) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.; IA No.13672/2020 – FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING; and, IA No.13674/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

Date : 07-02-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

Signature Not Verified

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Avijit Roy, AOR Digitally signed by MUKESH KUMAR Date: 2020.02.10 19:12:15 IST Reason:

Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manish Goswami, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Mr. Jaideep Gupta and Mr. Manoj Swarup, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that some of the teachers, whose appointments as a result of the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court [as affirmed by this Court] will now stand terminated at the end of the Academic Session 2019-2020, are otherwise fully eligible and have the requisite qualifications to be appointed as teachers.

Learned counsel further submitted that such candidates may not be within the permissible age bracket and will therefore stand deprived of any opportunity only because of age bar.

Issue notice confined to the question whether there could be any age relaxation insofar as the teachers already in employment and who otherwise have all the requisite qualifications and are otherwise competent.

Let the notice be made returnable on 16.03.2020.

At this juncture, the proforma respondents need not be served in the matter.

Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.

Liberty is granted to serve the learned Standing Counsel for the State.

It is made clear that the matters are confined only to the aforesaid question and rest of the submissions as advanced by the learned counsel stand rejected.

(MUKESH NASA) (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR