The State Of Tripura vs. Uggya Jai Mog
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Listed On:
16 Dec 2022
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.38 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDING BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. S.P.S. LALER Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5539/2022 THE STATE OF TRIPURA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BIPUL RANJAN DE & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 6803-6805/2022 (XIV) SLP(C) No. 6009/2022 (XIV) SLP(C) No. 11952/2022 (XIV) SLP(C) No. 15432/2022 (XIV) SLP(C) No. 16349/2022 (XIV) Date : 16-12-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, AOR Mr. Arnav Singh Deo, Adv. Mr. Sai Shashank, Adv. Mr. Deepayan Dutta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rituraj Biswas, AOR Mr. Alok Kumar, Adv. Mrs. Anjani Aiyagari, AOR Mr. N. A. Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Adv. Mr. Dushyant Parashar, AOR Mr. Muthu Velpalani M., Adv. Mr. Dinesh Pandey, Adv. Mr. Mahu Parashar, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following
O R D E R
SLP(C) No. 5539/2022
The above said matter is listed today, however, the office report does not mention about the said matter. Registry to explain the same, whether it is ready or not. If it is so, it must be updated in the office report. Digitally signed by PRIYANKA MALIK Date: 2022.12.23 09:09:22 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
SLP(C) No. 6803-6805/2022
Ld. counsel for petitioner has failed to file complete set of pleadings for issuance of notice, in respect of all the respondents.
However, as prayed, one week time, is granted to Ld. Counsel to comply with the order.
In case of compliance, list again on 06.02.2023.
In case of non-compliance, process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chambers, for further directions.
SLP(C) No. 6009/2022
Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent no. 2.
Service is not complete upon respondent no. 1. However, Mr. Muthu Velpalani M., Ld. Advocate for Mr. Dushyant Parashar, AOR has appeared on behalf of respondent no. 1. He seeks and is granted four weeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit.
List again on 06.02.2023.
SLP(C) No. 11952/2022
Ld. Counsel for respondent nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 have failed to file counter affidavit. However, as prayed, two weeks time, is granted to Ld. Counsel to file the same.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner has failed to file application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent no. 3. However, as prayed, two week time, is granted to Ld. Counsel to file the same.
In case of compliance, list again on 06.02.2023.
In case of non-compliance, process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chambers, for further directions.
SLP(C) No. 15432/2022
Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent nos. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7.
Ld. counsel for petitioner has taken fresh steps in respect of respondent nos. 3 and 6. Notice be issued.
In respect of respondent nos. 8 and 9, Ld. Counsel for petitioner has taken fresh steps however fresh particulars not filed. Three weeks time, as a last chance, is granted to Ld. Counsel to file fresh particulars for effecting service upon said respondents.
List again on 06.02.2023.
SLP(C) No. 16349/2022 (XIV)
Four weeks time, is granted to respondent nos. 1 to 7 to file counter affidavit.
List again on 06.02.2023.
S.P.S. LALER Registrar
pm