Global Indian Lawyers vs. Bar Council Of India

L ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.7 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17150-17154/2012 BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS A.K. BALAJI & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report on default) Date: 04/02/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN (IN CHAMBERS) For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. for Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Anshuman Upadhyay, Adv. for Mr. Hari Shankar K., Adv. Mr. R.R. David, Adv. Mr. Chitranshu Sinha, Adv. Mr. Febin Methew, Adv. for M/s. Dua Associates Mr. Abhilash Attri, Adv. for Mr. Bijoy Kumar Jain, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in spite of taking several steps, the petitioner could not serve the respondents mentioned in the Office Report even though efforts were made to serve them through the Embassy. ...2/- : 2 : Therefore, a prayer is made for deletion of these respondents. Permission granted. Accordingly, the names of respondent Nos. 9, 11, 12, 17, 20, 21, 24, 25, 27, 28, 30 to 32, 34, 35 and 38 are directed to be deleted from the array of parties.

Amended memo of parties be filed. Office to proceed further accordingly.

|(N.S.K. Kamesh) | |(Usha Sharma)