Aparna Mandal vs. Deepak Kumar

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:9 Oct 2015
CNR:SCIN010086682015

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

19 Mar 2015

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVIA

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). 449/2015

APARNA MANDAL PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

DEEPAK KUMAR RESPONDENT(S) (WITH APPLN. (S) FOR STAY AND OFFICE REPORT)

Date : 09/10/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajat Arora, Adv. Mr. Jaypreet Singh, Adv. Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Sureshan P., Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The transfer petition is allowed in terms of the

signed order.

[VINOD LAKHINA] [ASHA SONI] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

[SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE]

Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by Vinod Lakhina Date: 2015.10.10 13:03:28 IST Reason:

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.449/2015

APARNA MANDAL ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

DEEPAK KUMAR ...RESPONDENT

ORDER

  1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

  2. The ground on which the transfer prayed for has been resisted is that the petitioner-wife had made an incorrect statement to the effect that she is unemployed. The fact of her employment having been pointed out in the counter of the respondent, the petitioner-wife in rejoinder states that she is residing in Malda, West Bengal where she is employed.

  3. Having considered the matter, we are of the view that for the above misstatement the petitioner-wife should not be non-suited. There is no denial of the fact that she is living in Malda, West Bengal and is working there. In such 2

circumstances, we allow the prayer for transfer. Therefore, Matrimonial Suit No.253 of 2014, titled as "Deepak Kumar Vs. Aparna Mandal", pending before the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand is ordered to be transferred to the Court of District Judge, District Courts, Malda at West Bengal. The Family Court, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand shall send the case record to the transferee Court promptly and without any delay.

  1. The transfer petition is accordingly allowed.

  2. After transfer of the petition, the transferee Court is directed to make all endeavour

either for amicable settlement, failing which for

early decision in the main matter without unnecessary adjournments.

....................,J. (RANJAN GOGOI)

....................,J. (N.V. RAMANA)

NEW DELHI OCTOBER 09, 2015

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(8) - 9 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 9 Oct 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 9 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(5) - 4 Sept 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 4 Sept 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 4 Sept 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 15 May 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 15 May 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 27 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 27 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view