Chaitanya Bharati Educational Society Secretary D. Kamalakar Reddy S/O D. Ram Reddy vs. Admission And Fee Regulatory Committee Member Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
16 May 2018
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Item No.25 1
REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR
Civil Appeal No(s). 8151-8181/2013
GOVT.OF A.P.& ORS.ETC.ETC. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
GOVT.OF A.P..ETC.ETC. & ORS. Respondent(s)
( and IA No.107111/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
WITH
C.A. No. 8314-8315/2013 (XII-A)
W.P.(C) No. 154/2013 (X)
W.P.(C) No. 155/2013 (X)
W.P.(C) No. 567/2013 (X)
W.P.(C) No. 547/2013 (X)
Date : 16-05-2018 These appeals were called on for hearing today.
For Appellant(s) M/S. Venkat Palwai Law Associates, AOR M/S. Lawyer S Knit & Co, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. Piyush Dwivedi,Adv. M/S. Lawyer S Knit & Co, AOR M/S. Venkat Palwai Law Associates, AOR Mr. Navin Prakash, AOR Mr. G. N. Reddy, AOR Mr. Gopal Singh, AOR Mr. Harish Pandey, AOR Mr. A. V. Rangam, AOR Mr. Buddy. A. Rangaadhan,Adv. Signature Not Verified
Ms. Aanchal Arora,Adv.
Mr. Bijoy Kumar Jain, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Bharat J. Joshi,Adv. Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad, AOR Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao, AOR Mr. Prabhakar Parnam,Adv. Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, AOR Ms. E. R. Sumathy, AOR Mr. A. Ramesh,Adv. Mr. Syed Ahmad Naqvi,Adv. Ms. Shilpi Gupta,Adv. Ms. G. Madhavi, AOR Mr. M.B. Elakkumaran,Adv. Mr. Bijay Kumar,Adv. Mr. Y. Rajagopala Rao,Adv. Mr. K. Sharat Kumar,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
C.A. Nos. 8151-8181 and 8314-8315/2013
Registry to issue fresh notice of alternative arrangement to the proposed impleaded party.
List again on 7.8.2018.
W.P.(C) Nos. 154 and 155/2013
Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos.1, 2 and 5 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 6 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matters shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
These matters have already been directed to be listed before the Hon'ble Court. Therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in them.
SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar
MG