Dr. Sabitha Ramamurthy vs. Bangalore Development Authority
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Freshly Filed Adjourned
Before:
Hon'ble Abhay S. Oka, Hon'ble Sanjay Karol
Stage:
FRESHLY / ADJOURNED MATTERS
Remarks:
Delay Condoned and matter dismissed(including all pending IAs)
Listed On:
8 Jan 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.11 SECTION IV-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 8570/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-01-2023 in WA No. 1571/2014 and 1572/2014 passed by the High Court of Karnataka At Bengaluru)
DR. SABITHA RAMAMURTHY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.77976/2023-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.77974/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.77978/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. )
WITH Diary No(s). 8574/2023(IV-A)
(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.82084/2023-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.82082/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.82086/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. and IA No.82083/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)
Date : 01-08-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yathindra Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anand Sanjay M Nuli, Adv. Mr. Agam Sharma, Adv. Mr. Suraj Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Shiva Swaroop, Adv. M/S. Nuli & Nuli, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(CIVIL) Diary No(s). 8570/2023
Permission to file SLPs is granted.
Delay condoned.
Application for substitution is allowed.
The petitioner has never challenged the acquisition which was initiated on the basis of Notification dated 03.11.1977 followed by Notification dated 13.10.1980. The petitioner claims to be the subsequent purchaser of a part of the acquired property in the year 2006.
Hence, no case for interference is made out, the Special Leave Petitions are dismissed.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
SLP(C) Diary No(s). 8574/2023
Permission to file SLP(s) is granted.
Delay condoned.
Application for substitution is allowed.
No case for interference under Article 136 of the Constitution
of India is made out. The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(INDU MARWAH) (AVGV RAMU)